• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet The Real Banksy: Anonymity and Authenticity in the Art Market
Back

The Real Banksy: Anonymity and Authenticity in the Art Market

December 3, 2023

(Early photograph of Banksy and “Laugh Now But One Day We’ll Be In Charge,” Banksy, via Steve Lazarides).

By Alexandra Even

Banksy’s anonymity is as a part of his brand as his art. But it now appears the artist’s long-held secret may be in jeopardy: Banksy has recently been involved in a number of legal battles with a greeting card company over a trademark dispute and now a libel lawsuit. The lawsuits have named “Robin Gunningham” as a defendant, which Banksy has officially denied is his legal name, and the plaintiff has indicated it may request Banksy to reveal his true identity. This is just one example of how Banksy’s anonymity can rub up against the legal and practical reality of operating in the art market. So how does an artist as notorious and well-known as Banksy operate anonymously when such a large part of the art market is predicated on relationships and identity?

Banksy the Artist

Banksy is not a completely mysterious figure. While he has continued to remain anonymous throughout his career, that has not stopped him from giving veiled interviews or speaking through his associates. For instance, we know he grew up in Bristol, England and got involved in the underground street art there in the 1990s.[1] In an effort to evade the police, the artist began going by a pseudonym, first going by Robin Banx, later shortening it to Banksy (this was easier to write quickly on a wall).[2]

When he was 18, he realized stencils were a faster method that would allow him to make a quick getaway from law enforcement. Banksy once spoke on this, saying, “As soon as I cut my first stencil, I could feel the power there. I also like the political edge. All graffiti is low-level dissent, but stencils have an extra history. They’ve been used to start revolutions and to stop wars.”[3]

In 1999, Banksy headed to London and noticed that anonymity created its own aura of mystery around his art. What was once a measure to avoid police soon became a star-making promotional tool.[4] Starting in 2003, the artist began a series of stunts where he would go to major art museums (such as Tate Britain, the Louvre, and the Metropolitan Museum of Art) in disguise and enter his own art into the collection.[5]

Banksy first rose to international infamy in 2005 when he created a series of images in Palestine on the West Bank’s concrete wall. The images depicted ideas about escape, including a girl floating away with a group of balloons, a boy painting a ladder, and two children with a bucket and spade dreaming of a beach.[6] Ever political, Banksy released a statement following the appearance of his art calling Palestine, “the world’s largest open prison.”[7]

"Love is in the Air," Banksy, Bethlehem, Palestine (2005) via Banksy Explained
“Love is in the Air,” Banksy, Bethlehem, Palestine (2005) via Banksy Explained

Banksy’s bread and butter is his satirical stunts that make the elite the punchline: live rats skittering around a gallery opening filled with art critics and a live elephant painted red with fliers distributed to glittering event-goers reading, “There’s an elephant in the room…20 billion people live below the poverty line.”[8] The irony is, of course, how much Banksy’s art goes for these days, but that is not lost on him – “I love the way capitalism finds a place—even for its enemies. It’s definitely boom time in the discontent industry.”[9]

Banksy has always rejected the idea that he is a cog in the machine of the art market. In 2018, Banksy pranked Sotheby’s after they auctioned off his work for $1.2 million.[10] As soon as the gavel fell, the artwork went through a shredder built into the frame. However, the machine malfunctioned and the painting was shredded only halfway, inadvertently making the piece more valuable due to the notoriety brought by the stunt, later selling for $25.4 million.[11]

Banksy almost never works completely alone, especially as his stunts grew from spray painted graffiti art to large scale immersive exhibits. For example, Banksy opened the Walled Off Hotel, which is a permanent hotel in Bethlehem, Palestine and created Dismaland, which was a temporary experience in Somerset, England.[12] This last summer, Banksy had his first solo show in 15 years at the Glasgow’s Gallery of Modern Art titled, “Cut & Run: 25 Years of Card Labour.”[13] The exhibition was the first major career retrospective and was described as “his most elaborate and extensive exhibition to date,” including many of his works, stencils, and recreations of his childhood bedrooms, his desk, and his toilet.[14]

Given the large scale of his work and the amount of people that work with the artist, it is certainly a wonder that his identity has remained a secret for as long as it has. Beyond mystique, should Banksy reveal himself, he could potentially be faced with criminal charges in a number of jurisdictions for his vandalism, property destruction, and criminal mischief.[15] Over the years, speculation around his identity has grown to include many different figures.

Banksy the…Man?

You may be surprised to learn that we think we have a pretty good idea who Banksy is. The prevailing theory is that Banksy is Robin Gunningham, fellow Bristol native and named as a defendant in the recent defamation trial brought against Banksy by the greeting card company Full Colour Black.[16] A 2016 study showed that Gunningham’s known movements correlated to those of Banksy.[17] The name Robin would also connect to Banksy given his first anonymous street name was Robin Banx. Though no one has been able to absolutely link Gunningham to Banksy and the artist has repeatedly denied that this is him, it seems to be the most likely candidate in a slew of possibilities.

Early photo of Banksy with his face concealed, via Steve Lazarides
Early photo of Banksy with his face concealed, via Steve Lazarides

But nothing is for certain. Others think Banksy is Robert Del Naja, a member of the band Massive Attack, also known by his stage name “3D.”[18] Banksy fans have tracked Massive Attack’s tour dates and linked them to Banksy art cropping up. Robert Del Naja and Banksy are both from Bristol, travel in the same circles, have said that they are friends, and Banksy is known to be a Massive Attack fan, using their music in his Walled Off Hotel and Dismaland.[19]

A recently unearthed clip from a 2003 BBC interview seems to reveal Banksy’s identity. The interviewer, Nigel Wrench, asks Banksy if his name is “Robert Banks” and the artist replies, “It’s Robbie.”[20] Although some are taking this clip as a monumental revelation, names close to “Robbie” have been revealed in the past, so this discovery feels in no way conclusive.

Some even believe that “Banksy” has now come to refer to a collective of artists instead of one single man. Given the wide ranging and large scale of his more recent projects, it seems likely that more and more artists are contributing to Banksy’s work under his moniker.[21] Many of his works have grown to include artists such as John D’oh, James AME72 Ame, and Damien Hirst, who himself has been charged with being Banksy.[22]

Whatever the case, Banksy’s identity is simultaneously a closely guarded secret and an open one. Clearly a great number of people know who Banksy is and are unwilling to share the information. The mystique around his identity is as much a part of his brand as his art, and his close friends and collaborators are unwilling to relinquish the magic of his anonymity.

One such collaborator, Banksy’s former agent and friend Steve Lazarides, traveled the world with Banksy, documenting and photographing his antics and managing his early career.[23] Once, in a televised interview, he referred to Banksy as “Rob” while he was telling a story.[24] When the interviewer pressed him on it, he said “That name’s out there. And who says it’s real…Robin, Robert, Robbie.”[25] Though the two have parted ways, Lazarides said he would never reveal the artist’s identity: “the general public don’t want it. If I revealed his face, it’s like telling a five-year-old that Santa Claus isn’t real. Why would I do that? And I think, you know, the general public have constructed a folk hero, and I’m not going to take that away from them.”[26]

The Real Banksy

But how can Banksy operate in the art world without any direct personal contact to it? The answer, like much of Banksy’s work of late, is that it requires a great number of people working on his behalf.

Because a quick escape from law enforcement necessitates the use of stencils, the Banksy art market is prone to forgeries.[27] To combat this, Banksy relies on his own personal authentication service, Pest Control.[28] Beginning in 2008, the service is the only official body that can authenticate a Banksy – in other words, you have to go through Banksy to buy a Banksy.[29] Pest Control is also the only point of sale when new work is available (which it rarely is).

Pest Control will authenticate a Banksy already owned or will work with buyers and sellers to authenticate an item that is in the process of being sold.[30] As is Banksy’s way, the authentication is done in rather clever ways. All certificates come with half of a fake Princess Diana ten pound note – Pest Control keeps the other half as a match.[31] Certificates of Authenticity (CoA) issued after 2020 come with an image of a rat running in a wheel (see image below).

Pest Control COA – On the left, CoA from pre-2020 (2003). On the right, CoA from post-2020 (2020).
Pest Control COA – On the left, CoA from pre-2020 (2003). On the right, CoA from post-2020 (2020).
Pest Control COA – On the left, CoA from pre-2020 (2003). On the right, CoA from post-2020 (2020).
Pest Control COA – On the left, CoA from pre-2020 (2003). On the right, CoA from post-2020 (2020).

Before Pest Control, there was Pictures on Walls (POW). The artist collective began in 2003 as an opportunity for artists to work outside the stale constraints of the art world. POW allowed artists to sell directly without having to pay commission to a dealer, produced high quality for street artists who might not otherwise be able to profit from their art, and would authenticate Banksys.[32] However, as Banksy’s and the other artist’s fame grew, POW’s business model became less and less realistic – works trickled down into the mainstream market and were fetching high prices.[33] As a result, POW closed its doors in 2017, and Pest Control remains as the only authenticator of Banksy’s works.

The process of getting a piece authenticated by Pest Control is not designed to turn a profit – rather the service charges £100 for a screen print and £150 for an original, just enough to cover costs. Inquirers will not be charged if the work is to be found fake.[34] Banksy’s characteristic irreverence bleeds even into this process: the Pest Control website states, “Many Banksy pieces are created in an advanced state of intoxication, which can make the task of authenticating his works lengthy and challenging” and “He would encourage anyone wanting to purchase one of his images to do so with extreme caution, but does point out that many copies are superior in quality to the originals.”[35]

Bansky Unmasked?

Throughout his career, Banksy has been no stranger to litigation and criminal charges. But none have come so close to revealing his identity as his ongoing dispute with the greeting card company Full Colour Black.

The controversy began in 2019 when Full Colour Black (FCB) filed a trademark dispute against Banksy. The greeting card company specialized in reproducing street art on their cards. Apparently, they offered royalties to Banksy’s representatives, which he refused.[36] Famous for once writing, “copyright is for losers,” Banksy avoids enforcing his copyright.[37] He encourages his fans to freely use images of his work for non-commercial purposes.[38] Not only is he against it for personal and political reasons, but to enforce his copyright in works would be to expose his closely-guarded identity. To assert a claim in copyright, Pest Control may have to prove they had acquired copyright from Banksy, which could require him to reveal his real name.[39]

Because of this, Banksy typically opts for enforcing trademarks. FCB’s trademark dispute was over an image of a monkey with a sandwich board reading, “Laugh now but one day we’ll be in charge.” Banksy had trademarked the image and FCB disputed the filing with the European Union Intellectual Property Office, saying that it was made in bad faith. The EUIPO first ruled against Banksy, stating that the filing repeatedly referred to Banksy, not Pest Control, and that Banksy would need to apply in his name.[40] However, on appeal the decision was reversed in favor of Banksy, with the EUIPO stating FCB failed to show “clearly dishonest behavior” on the part of Pest Control or Banksy.[41]

The now-deleted Instagram post made by Banksy on November 18, 2022 via The Sun.
The now-deleted Instagram post made by Banksy on November 18, 2022 via The Sun.

But the battle is far from over. FCB recently filed a libel claim in the Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court over a now-deleted Instagram post from Banksy.[42] The post was made in November 2022, around when the EUIPO reversed in favor of Banksy.[43] An image of a GUESS store front (the company was also previously locked in a trademark battle with Banksy) with one of FCB’s trademarks “Brandalised” accompanies a caption reading, “Alerting all shoplifters. Please go to GUESS on Regent Street. They’ve helped themselves to my artwork without asking, how can it be wrong for you to do the same to their clothes?”[44] The lawsuit named “the artist known as Banksy” and “Robin Gunningham” as defendants in the case and plaintiffs seek $1.6 million for “grave damages.”[45]

FCB alleges that this post, sent out to Banksy’s 11.9 million Instagram followers, “goes to the heart of the Claimant’s business reputation” and caused them to suffer serious financial loss because the store had to be closed to the public when a crowd of Banksy followers created a disturbance.[46] FCB’s lawyers indicated in the filing that they may seek the artist’s unmasking: “His true identity has not been disclosed to the public but he carries on his public activities under the pseudonym ‘Banksy’…The claimant reserves the right to seek an order that he identifies himself for the purposes of these proceedings.”[47]

Conclusion

It remains to be seen whether Banksy’s true identity will be forced into the limelight. What is abundantly clear given his long history of protecting his identity is that he won’t go down without a fight. Some believe the likelihood that a court would force Banksy to reveal himself is quite low.[48] But with a public fascinated by the mysterious figure Banksy has created for himself, it feels like only a matter of time before he may have to step out of the shadows.

Suggested Reading/Watching:

  • Banksy, Exit Through the Gift Shop (2010). (documentary)
  • Banksy, Wall and Piece (2005). (book)
  • Lauren Collins, “Banksy Was Here,” The New Yorker, (May 2007). (magazine article)
  • “The mysteries of Banksy,” CBS Sunday Morning, (2023). (televised interview)
  • Will Elsworth-Jones, Banksy: The Man Behind the Wall (2021, revised and illustrated). (book)

About the Author:

Alexandra Even is a third year law student at Boston College Law School. She studied art history and communication at Santa Clara University and has spent her time in law school studying the cross-section between art and law.

Sources:

  1. Will Ellsworth-Jones, The Story Behind Banksy, (Feb 2013), https://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/the-story-behind-banksy-4310304/. ↑
  2. Id. ↑
  3. Id. ↑
  4. CBS Sunday Morning, “The mysteries of Banksy,” (Aug 2023), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36mxkE4BHoE. ↑
  5. Will Ellsworth-Jones, “The Story Behind Banksy,” Smithsonian Magazine, (Feb. 2013), https://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/the-story-behind-banksy-4310304/ ↑
  6. The Segregation Wall, Banksy Explained, Banksy Blog, https://banksyexplained.com/the-segregation-wall-palestine-2005/ (see this link for a video of Banksy and crew painting the images on the wall in broad daylight). ↑
  7. Id. ↑
  8. Will Ellsworth-Jones, “The Story Behind Banksy,” Smithsonian Magazine, (Feb. 2013), https://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/the-story-behind-banksy-4310304/ ↑
  9. Id. ↑
  10. “Half-shredded Banksy fetches $25.4 mln on return to Sotheby’s,” Reuters, (2021), https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/5-8-million-half-shredded-banksy-try-sothebys-2021-10-14/ ↑
  11. Id. ↑
  12. See websites for the two experiences: https://dismaland.co.uk/; https://walledoffhotel.com/ ↑
  13. Sarah Cascone, “Banksy’s Blockbuster Show in Glasgow Attracted Record Crowds—and the Artist Wants You to Decide Where It Should Travel Next,” (Aug. 2023) https://news.artnet.com/art-world/banksy-glasgow-show-attracts-record-crowds-2355204. ↑
  14. https://www.myartbroker.com/artist-banksy/articles/inside-banksy-cut-and-run-exhibition ↑
  15. Tyson Mitman, “An upcoming defamation case could finally unmask the famous street artist Banksy—but he may not be just one person,” (Oct. 2023), https://fortune.com/europe/2023/10/12/who-is-banksy-graffiti-street-artist-collective-defamation-case/ ↑
  16. Adam Schrader, “Will Banksy’s Identity Finally Be Unmasked in a Defamation Lawsuit Brought by a U.K. Greeting Card Company?” ArtNet, (Oct. 2023), https://news.artnet.com/art-world/full-color-blank-suing-banksy-not-robin-gunningham-2371795. ↑
  17. “Banksy unmasked? Scientists use maths and criminology to map artist’s identity,” The Guardian, (Mar. 2016)https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2016/mar/05/banksy-unmasked-scientists-use-maths-and-criminology-to-map-artists-identity ↑
  18. Emily Shugerman, “Banksy: 8 signs Massive Attack’s Robert Del Naja is mystery artist,” The Independent (Oct. 2018) https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/news/banksy-robert-del-naja-massive-attack-art-who-is-he-identity-real-name-graffiti-music-similarities-a7805741.html ↑
  19. Id. ↑
  20. Carita Rizzo, “Banksy’s Identity Finally Revealed in Lost Interview,” ArtNews, (Nov. 21, 2023). ↑
  21. Tyson Mitman, “An upcoming defamation case could finally unmask the famous street artist Banksy—but he may not be just one person,” (Oct. 2023), https://fortune.com/europe/2023/10/12/who-is-banksy-graffiti-street-artist-collective-defamation-case/ ↑
  22. Id. ↑
  23. Gemma Peplow, “Banksy – the most revealing photo yet? How his former agent documented art’s biggest mystery,”(Nov. 2019), https://news.sky.com/story/banksy-the-most-revealing-photo-yet-how-his-former-agent-documented-arts-biggest-mystery-11849365 ↑
  24. CBS Sunday Morning, “The mysteries of Banksy,” (Aug 2023), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36mxkE4BHoE. ↑
  25. Id. ↑
  26. Gemma Peplow, “Banksy – the most revealing photo yet? How his former agent documented art’s biggest mystery,”(Nov. 2019), https://news.sky.com/story/banksy-the-most-revealing-photo-yet-how-his-former-agent-documented-arts-biggest-mystery-11849365 ↑
  27. Tyson Mitman, “An upcoming defamation case could finally unmask the famous street artist Banksy—but he may not be just one person,” (Oct. 2023), https://fortune.com/europe/2023/10/12/who-is-banksy-graffiti-street-artist-collective-defamation-case/ ↑
  28. Pest Control, https://pestcontroloffice.com/index.asp; Joe Syer, “Pest Control: A Guide To Verifying Banksy Prints For Buyers & Sellers,” My Art Broker, https://www.myartbroker.com/artist-banksy/guides/how-to-verify-banksy-prints-with-pest-control ↑
  29. Joe Syer, “Pest Control: A Guide To Verifying Banksy Prints For Buyers & Sellers,” My Art Broker, https://www.myartbroker.com/artist-banksy/guides/how-to-verify-banksy-prints-with-pest-control. ↑
  30. Id. ↑
  31. Id. ↑
  32. Id. ↑
  33. Id. ↑
  34. Pest Control, Authentications, https://pestcontroloffice.com/auth1.asp. ↑
  35. Joe Syer, “Pest Control: A Guide To Verifying Banksy Prints For Buyers & Sellers,” My Art Broker, https://www.myartbroker.com/artist-banksy/guides/how-to-verify-banksy-prints-with-pest-control ↑
  36. Enrico Bonadio, “Banksy’s trademark battle exposes a huge hypocrisy in his anti-copyright views,” Quartz, (Oct. 2019), https://qz.com/quartzy/1726408/banksys-trademark-dispute-with-full-colour-black-could-backfire. ↑
  37. Bruce Berman, “‘Copyright is for Losers,’ Says, Street Artist, Banksy: Some Trademarks Not,” IP Up Close, (May 2019), https://ipcloseup.com/2019/05/07/copyright-is-for-losers-says-street-artist-banksy-some-trademarks-not/#:~:text=Banksy’s%20satiric%20images%20are%20among,control%20and%20prevent%20over%2Dcommercialization. ↑
  38. See Pest Control, https://pestcontroloffice.com/use.asp, (stating, “You are welcome to use Banksy’s images for non-commercial, personal amusement. Print them out in a colour that matches your curtains, make a card for your gran, submit them as your own homework, whatever. But neither Banksy or Pest Control licence the artist’s images to third parties. Please do not use Banksy’s images for any commercial purpose”). ↑
  39. Enrico Bonadio, “Banksy’s trademark battle exposes a huge hypocrisy in his anti-copyright views,” Quartz, (Oct. 2019), https://qz.com/quartzy/1726408/banksys-trademark-dispute-with-full-colour-black-could-backfire. ↑
  40. Adam Schrader, “EU rules in favor of Banksy in trademark dispute, allowing him to remain anonymous,” United Press International, (Nov. 2022), https://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2022/11/18/eu-rules-in-favor-banksy-trademark-dispute-anonymity-guess/7871668829898/. ↑
  41. Id. ↑
  42. Adam Schrader, “Will Banksy’s Identity Finally Be Unmasked in a Defamation Lawsuit Brought by a U.K. Greeting Card Company?” ArtNet, (Oct. 2023), https://news.artnet.com/art-world/full-color-blank-suing-banksy-not-robin-gunningham-2371795. ↑
  43. Id. ↑
  44. Tristan Kirk, “Banksy sued for £1.3m over ‘grave damage’ of Instagram post about fashion store,” The Standard, (Oct. 2023), https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/banksy-sued-instagram-post-guess-full-colour-black-b1111802.html. ↑
  45. Id. ↑
  46. Id. ↑
  47. Id. ↑
  48. Adam Schrader, “Will Banksy’s Identity Finally Be Unmasked in a Defamation Lawsuit Brought by a U.K. Greeting Card Company?” ArtNet, (Oct. 2023), https://news.artnet.com/art-world/full-color-blank-suing-banksy-not-robin-gunningham-2371795. ↑

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Where will the Parthenon Marbles Go?
Next The Fate of the ARR Within the Contemporary Landscape of the Art Market in the U.K. and Australia

Related Posts

logo

Body Painting in NY

September 12, 2011

An Introduction to Swiss Copyright Law

August 13, 2021

Gurlitt Reading List

December 4, 2013
Center for Art Law
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

The expansion of the use of collaborations between The expansion of the use of collaborations between artists and major consumer corporations brings along a myriad of IP legal considerations. What was once seen in advertisement initiatives  has developed into the creation of "art objects," something that lives within a consumer object while retaining some portion of an artists work. 

🔗 Read more about this interesting interplay in Natalie Kawam Yang's published article, including a discussion on how the LOEWE x Ghibli Museum fits into this context, using the link in our bio.
We can't wait for you to join us on February 4th! We can't wait for you to join us on February 4th!  Check out the full event description below:

Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Collo Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Colloquium, discussing the effectiveness of no strike designations in Syria, on February 2nd. Check out the full event description below:

No strike designations for cultural heritage are one mechanism by which countries seek to uphold the requirements of the 1954 Hague Convention. As such, they are designed to be key instruments in protecting the listed sites from war crimes. Yet not all countries maintain such inventories of their own whether due to a lack of resources, political views about what should be represented, or the risk of misuse and abuse. This often places the onus on other governments to create lists about cultures other than their own during conflicts. Thus, there may be different lists compiled by different governments in a conflict, creating an unclear legal landscape for determining potential war crimes and raising significant questions about the effectiveness of no strikes as a protection mechanism. 

Michelle Fabiani will discuss current research seeking to empirically evaluate the effectiveness of no strike designations as a protection mechanism against war crimes in Syria. Using data on cultural heritage attacks from the height of the Syrian Conflict (2014-2017) compiled from open sources, a no strike list completed in approximately 2012, and measures of underlying risk, this research asks whether the designations served as a protective factor or a risk factor for a given site and the surrounding area. Results and implications for holding countries accountable for war crimes against cultural heritage are discussed. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #culturalheritage #lawyer #legalreserach #artlawyer
Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day train Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #copyright #CLE #trainingprogram
In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, The Phillips Collection sold seven works of art from their collection at auction in November. The decision to deaccession three works in particular have led to turmoil within the museum's governing body. The works at the center of the controversy include Georgia O'Keefe's "Large Dark Red Leaves on White" (1972) which sold for $8 million, Arthur Dove's "Rose and Locust Stump" (1943), and "Clowns et pony" an 1883 drawing by Georges Seurat. Together, the three works raised $13 million. Three board members have resigned, while members of the Phillips family have publicly expressed concerns over the auctions. 

Those opposing the sales point out that the works in question were collected by the museum's founders, Duncan and Marjorie Phillips. While museums often deaccession works that are considered reiterative or lesser in comparison to others by the same artist, the works by O'Keefe, Dove, and Seurat are considered highly valuable, original works among the artist's respective oeuvres. 

The museum's director, Jonathan P. Binstock, has defended the sales, arguing that the process was thorough and reflects the majority interests of the collection's stewards. He believes that acquiring contemporary works will help the museum to evolve. Ultimately, the controversy highlights the difficulties of maintaining institutional collections amid conflicting perspectives.

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more.
Make sure to check out our newest episode if you h Make sure to check out our newest episode if you haven’t yet!

Paris and Andrea get the change to speak with Patty Gerstenblith about how the role international courts, limits of accountability, and if law play to protect history in times of war.

🎙️ Click the link in our bio to listen anywhere you get your podcasts!
Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was a Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was arrested by Polish authorities in Warsaw. on December 4th. Butyagin is wanted by Ukraine for allegedly conducting illegal excavations of Myrmekion, an ancient city in Crimea. Located in present-day Crimea, Myrmekion was an Ancient Greek colony dating to the sixth century, BCE. 

According to Ukrainian officials, between 2014 and 2019 Butyagin destroyed parts of the Myrmekion archaeological site while serving as head of Ancient Archaeology of the Northern Black Sea region at St. Petersburg's Hermitage Museum. The resulting damages are estimated at $4.7 million. Notably, Russia's foreign ministry has denounced the arrest, describing Poland's cooperation with Ukraine's extradition order as "legal tyranny." Russia invaded and annexed Crimea in 2014.

🔗 Read more by clicking the link in our bio

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artcrime #artlooting #ukraine #crimea
Join us on February 18th to learn about the proven Join us on February 18th to learn about the provenance and restitution of the Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art.

A beloved Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art was accused of being looted by the Nazis. Professor Deborah Gerhardt will describe the issues at stake and the evidentiary trail that led to an unusual model for resolving the dispute.

Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #museumissues #artwork
“In the depth of winter, I finally learned that wi “In the depth of winter, I finally learned that within me there lay an invincible summer."
~ Albert Camus, "Return to Tipasa" (1952) 

Camus is on our reading list but for now, stay close to the ground to avoid the deorbit burn from the 2026 news and know that we all contain invincible summer. 

The Center for Art Law's January 2026 Newsletter is here—catch up on the latest in art law and start the year informed.
https://itsartlaw.org/newsletters/january-newsletter-which-way-is-up/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #lawyer #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #art #law #newsletter #january
Major corporations increasingly rely on original c Major corporations increasingly rely on original creative work to train AI models, often claiming a fair use defense. However, many have flagged this interpretation of copyright law as illegitimate and exploitative of artists. In July, the Senate Judiciary Committee on Crime and Counterterrorism addressed these issues in a hearing on copyright law and AI training. 

Read our recent article by Katelyn Wang to learn more about the connection between AI training, copyright protections, and national security. 

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more!
Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all- Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all-day  CLE program to train lawyers to work with visual artists and their unique copyright needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys specializing in copyright law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the li Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the life of Lauren Stein, a 2L at Wake Forest, as she crushes everything in her path. 

Want to help us foster more great minds? Donate to Center for Art Law.

🔗 Click the link below to donate today!

https://itsartlaw.org/donations/new-years-giving-tree/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #caselaw #lawyer #art #lawstudent #internships #artlawinternship
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.