• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Where will the Parthenon Marbles Go?
Back

Where will the Parthenon Marbles Go?

November 28, 2023

image from the British museum of Elgin Marbles Parthenon

By Dea Sula

There has been a global trend of restitution and repatriation of cultural objects. Hundreds of items have been repatriated in 2023.[1] Countries are passing laws to make the process more efficient, such as France, which has passed three laws in 2023 to increase the efficiency of restitution.[2] Similarly, other countries are encouraging the return of their cultural objects, such as Poland, which has initiated 130 restitution claims,[3] and Nigeria in its pursuit of the Benin Bronzes.[4] Museum institutions are also taking part. The Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York launched a new initiative to go through its entire collection to identify any stolen objects.[5]

In contrast, one institution that has been generally resistant to restitution is the British Museum. The Parthenon Marbles, which have been in the museum’s possession since 1816, is a case study of many of the legal issues and constraints that museums face regarding restitution, as well as the international issues that arise from cultural objects that were removed from their place of origin prior to the modern period.[6]

Acquisition

The Parthenon is a temple that was built in ancient Athens, Greece during the 5th century BCE.[7] Over time, the Parthenon changed purpose, becoming a church and a mosque, eventually being used to house weaponry and gunpowder in 1687.[8] By the 1800s the Parthenon was considered a ruin, and half of the sculptures were lost. [9]

During the period of the Parthenon Marbles’ acquisition, Greece was a province in the Ottoman Empire.[10] Thomas Bruce, also known as the Earl of Elgin, was assigned as the British Ambassador to the Ottoman state, and during his tenure, he acquired a set of statutes and friezes from the Parthenon through authorization from the Ottoman government.[11] Elgin was attracted to the historical and artistic merit of the sculptures, a nod to the neoclassical resurgence that was popular in England. Elgin claimed that local people were using the statues as targets for shooting practice, so his acquisition was in an attempt to preserve the sculptures, as well.

The pieces were sent to England, surviving a shipwreck in 1804, and arrived in 1806.[12] Even then, the Marbles were contentious, as there were both supporters and critics of the move. The poet Lord Byron famously wrote The Curse of Minerva in part due to his distaste for what Elgin had done.[13] The House of Commons launched an investigation into the legality of transporting the Marbles, and Elgin published a defense of his actions in 1810.[14] The crown purchased the collection of statues in 1816, which were placed in the British Museum.[15]

From this time, the Parthenon Marbles have continued to be a source of controversy and illustrate international museum legal issues surrounding cultural property.

Movement for Repatriation

The Greek government has been asking for the return of the Parthenon Marbles since its independence in 1835.[16] The first official request was made in 1983. Regarding the issue, the then Greek Minister of Culture Melina Mercouri, in a speech to Oxford University, said,

“You must understand what the Parthenon Marbles mean to us. They are our pride. They are our sacrifices. They are our noblest symbol of excellence. They are a tribute to the democratic philosophy. They are our aspirations and our name. They are the essence of Greekness.”[17]

The requests for repatriation have continued into the current day, often being a topic of discussion when politicians from Greece and England meet; the last talks regarding repatriation occurred in 2021 and 2022.[18][19]

In addition, international bodies and other countries have pressured the British Museum to return the Marbles. For example, UNESCO authorized a committee recommendation to return the Marbles,[20] a suggestion that was soundly rejected.[21] In a later post Brexit trade negotiation, the EU stated that Britain would need to return the Marbles in order to reach a trade deal.[22] Another example is the Chinese president Xi Jinping publicly supporting Greece in their quest for the return of the Marbles.[23]

Greece argues that the Marbles are part of the Greek people’s cultural heritage and should be returned. Now, there is a large modern museum complex dedicated to the Parthenon, and the Greek government argues that the collection of Marbles should be a complete set located in the museum. On the legal side, Greece argues that the permission to remove the Marbles came from an occupying force, not the Greek government, and therefore the consent was not legitimate.[24] The opposing argument is that the Ottoman government was legitimate at the time of the agreement and could therefore grant ownership of the Marbles to Elgin. The “illegal sale” argument is also weakened by the large amount of time between the time of sale and the current claims.[25]

To support keeping the Marbles in London, proponents argue that the Marbles are part of global heritage, where cultural heritage belongs to everyone as part of a universal human history.[26] A spokesperson for the museum argued, “we’re not going to dismantle our great collection as it tells a unique story of our common humanity.”[27] It would be a blow to the museum to lose the Marbles for artistic and historical reasons. Another argument is the long-term care of the Marbles, as the statues that have remained in Athens have been heavily affected by pollution and acid rain.[28] This argument is not as strong since the Marbles can now be housed in the Acropolis Museum.[29] This argument also looks weaker due to the British Museum’s own maintenance issues, such as a roof leak that caused the Marbles enough damage for them to not be displayed for a year.[30]

Legal Issues

A block to potentially returning the Marbles is the legal restraints on the British Museum from the British government. The 1963 Museum Act specifically regulates the British Museum Board on deaccessioning items.[31] The Board of Trustees cannot remove or return any object from the collection unless it is a duplicate, physically damaged, “unfit to be retained the collection,” or no longer of public interest.[32] This policy was approved by the board of trustees in 2018 and is set to be reviewed in 2023.[33]

While the law generally blocks removing items from the collection, the British government has passed laws bypassing the requirement; in 2004 for human remains,[34] and in 2009 for Nazi-looted work.[35] Even with current British law, the 2022 Charities Act might be a way for the museum to return the Marbles.[36] Under the law, trustees have the power to return objects “if there is a compelling moral obligation to do so,” giving trustees the ability to say yes to returning the Marbles if they find it a moral obligation.[37]

Therefore, while the 1965 Act is still in effect, it can be bypassed when there is enough political will to do so or if the trustees find the return of the Marbles a morally compelling issue. The question is if that drive or moral attitude exists and if it is strong enough to counter the political objections regarding the Marbles. An indication that this resolve does not exist is from the 2019 resignation letter of one of the board members, claiming that the museum regarding restitution was “born and bred in empire and colonial practice, [and] is coming under scrutiny. And yet it hardly speaks.”[38]

Ways forward?

One outcome is that the British Museum will not return the Marbles due to legal constraints or lack of desire to do so. Another outcome is if the British government and the board authorize a return of the Marbles through a specific law or through an amendment to the current law, although this is unlikely.

A loan agreement structure has been proposed, as the British Museum Chair of Trustees said the museum is “seeking new positive, long term partnerships with countries and communities around the world, and that of course includes Greece.”[39] The Greek government will likely reject this since it is seeking ownership and would not want the British government to retain an ownership interest.

Even if the British Museum were to return the Marbles, further issues for the British Museum would likely follow since many of the museum’s pieces came from similar circumstances. One restitution could create a snowball effect on the British Museum collection. But if the museum does not change its policies, public opinion may go against the museum, especially in a time where there is a global push for repatriation.

Overall, it appears that the Parthenon Marbles will continue to be contentious objects since no clear resolution is in sight. The British Museum’s stance on the Marbles reflects its position generally against restitution, an increasingly unpopular stance in the art world. The issues the Pantheon Marbles present will persist as repatriation and restitution remain forefront issues regarding cultural property.

 

Suggested Readings

Who Saved the Parthenon?: A New History of the Acropolis Before, During and After the Greek Revolution By William St. Clair

Return or Retain? The Parthenon Marbles Debate

The past, present: The Parthenon Sculptures dispute as an example of the ICPRCP’s role on claims barred by the non-retroactivity of the 1970 UNESCO Convention By Letícia Machado Haertel

After 220 Years, the Fate of the Parthenon Marbles Rests in Secret Talks By Alex Marshall

About the Author

Dea Sula is a current third year law student at Santa Clara University School of Law. She is passionate about Intellectual Property and Art Law. She is the current Center for Art Law Case Law Corner Database project coordinator.

Sources:

  1. Emily Buracke, Is 2023 the Year Looted Art Returns Home?, Town and Country (Sep. 20, 2023),https://www.townandcountrymag.com/leisure/arts-and-culture/a42660309/repatriated-artwork-timeline-2023/. ↑
  2. Francesca Aton, Three Laws Proposed by France’s Ministry of Culture May Lead to Groundbreaking Restitutions, ARTnews (Jan. 18, 2023), https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/france-proposed-laws-restitution-african-art-human-remains-1234654048/. ↑
  3. Emily Buracke, Is 2023 the Year Looted Art Returns Home?, Town and Country (Sep. 20, 2023),https://www.townandcountrymag.com/leisure/arts-and-culture/a42660309/repatriated-artwork-timeline-2023/. ↑
  4. Id. ↑
  5. Robin Pogrebin and Graham Bowley, After Seizures, the Met Sets a Plan to Scour Collections for Looted Art, N.Y. Times (May 9, 2023), https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/09/arts/met-museum-looted-art.html. ↑
  6. Historically called the Elgin Marbles. ↑
  7. The Parthenon, Ancient-Greece.org ( https://www.ancient-greece.org/architecture/parthenon.html ↑
  8. The Editors of Encyclopaedia, Elgin Marbles, Encyclopedia Britannica (Sep. 3, 2023), https://www.britannica.com/topic/Elgin-Marbles. ↑
  9. Id. ↑
  10. Id. ↑
  11. Id. ↑
  12. Id. ↑
  13. Edited by Peter Cochran, The Curse of Minerva, https://petercochran.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/the_curse_of_minerva1.pdf ↑
  14. The Editors of Encyclopaedia, Elgin Marbles, Encyclopedia Britannica (Sep. 3, 2023), https://www.britannica.com/topic/Elgin-Marbles. ↑
  15. Id. ↑
  16. Salvatore Settis, History in the making, The Guardian (Jan. 19, 2004), https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2004/jan/19/art.parthenon. ↑
  17. Alison Lindsey Moore, Looted Art: The Case of the Parthenon Sculptures, 34 THE OSPREY JOURNAL OF IDEAS AND INQUIRY (2007), https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1033&context=ojii_volumes. ↑
  18. Tessa Solomon, The British Museum Has Been in Secret Talks with Greece Over the Return of the Parthenon Marbles, ARTnews (Dec. 5, 2022), https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/british-museum-and-greece-secretly-discuss-return-of-parthenon-Marbles-1234649187/. ↑
  19. Geraldine Kendall Adams, British Museum opens door to Parthenon deal with Greece, Museums Association (Aug. 2, 2022), https://www.museumsassociation.org/museums-journal/news/2022/08/british-museum-opens-door-to-parthenon-deal-with-greece/. ↑
  20. Tessa Solomon, UNESCO Advisory Board Urges British Museum to Return the Parthenon Marbles, ARTnews (Oct. 4, 2021), https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/unesco-advisory-board-urges-british-museum-to-return-the-parthenon-Marbles-1234605592/. ↑
  21. News Desk, UK GOVERNMENT REJECTS UNESCO PLEA TO READDRESS OWNERSHIP OF PARTHENON MARBLES, Art Forum (Oct. 7, 2021), (https://www.artforum.com/news/uk-government-rejects-unesco-plea-to-readdress-ownership-of-parthenon-Marbles-250760/ ↑
  22. Adam Payne, The EU Will Tell Britain to Give Back the Ancient Parthenon Marbles, Taken from Greece Over 200 Years Ago, If It Wants a Post-Brexit Trade Deal, BUS. INSIDER (Feb. 20, 2020), https://www.businessinsider.com/brexit-eu-to-ask-uk-to-return-elgin-Marbles-to-greece-in-trade-talks2020-2. ↑
  23. Illiani Magra, In Struggle Over Parthenon Marbles, Greece Gets Unexpected Ally: Xi Jinping, N.Y. TIMES (Nov. 13, 2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/13/world/europe/parthenonMarbles-xi-jinping-greece-china.html. ↑
  24. Alison Lindsey Moore, Looted Art: The Case of the Parthenon Sculptures, 34 THE OSPREY JOURNAL OF IDEAS AND INQUIRY (2007), https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1033&context=ojii_volumes. ↑
  25. Id. ↑
  26. Tessa Solomon, The British Museum Has Been in Secret Talks with Greece Over the Return of the Parthenon Marbles, ARTnews (Dec. 5, 2022), https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/british-museum-and-greece-secretly-discuss-return-of-parthenon-Marbles-1234649187/. ↑
  27. Id. ↑
  28. John E. Yocom, Air Pollution Damage To Buildings On The Acropolis, 29 Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association 333 (1979), https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00022470.1979.10470796. ↑
  29. The Acropolis Museum https://www.theacropolismuseum.gr/en. ↑
  30. Cristina Ruiz, How British Museum’s maintenance woes have kept Parthenon Marbles off view for a full year, The Art Newspaper (Nov. 2, 2021), https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2021/11/02/how-maintenance-woes-kept-parthenon-Marbles-off-view ↑
  31. Alexandra Tremayne-Pengelly, The UK Has a 60-Year Old Law Prohibiting Repatriation of Art. Is That About to Change?, The Observer (Feb. 11, 2023), https://observer.com/2023/02/the-uk-has-a-60-year-old-law-prohibiting-repatriation-of-art-is-that-about-to-change/#:~:text=Under%20the%20act%2C%20the%20British,to%20the%20museum’s%20deaccessioning%20policy. ↑
  32. The British Museum Board of Trustees, De-accession Policy, The British Museum (Sep. 29, 2018), https://www.britishmuseum.org/sites/default/files/2019-10/De-accession_Policy_Nov2018.pdf. ↑
  33. Id. ↑
  34. Human Tissue Act 2004 (c. 30), https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/30/contents. ↑
  35. Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) Act 2009 (c. 16), https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/16/section/1. ↑
  36. Charities Act 2022 (c. 6), https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2022/6/contents/enacted. ↑
  37. Duncan Howitt-Marshall, New Charities Act may compel museums to return cultural artifacts, Ekathimerini (Sep. 30, 2022), https://www.ekathimerini.com/culture/1194535/new-charities-act-may-compel-museums-to-return-cultural-artifacts/. ↑
  38. Ahdaf Soueif, On Resigning from the British Museum’s Board of Trustees, London Review of Books Blog (July 15, 2019), https://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2019/july/on-resigning-from-the-british-museum-s-board-of-trustees. ↑
  39. Tessa Solomon, The British Museum Has Been in Secret Talks with Greece Over the Return of the Parthenon Marbles, ARTnews (Dec. 5, 2022), https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/british-museum-and-greece-secretly-discuss-return-of-parthenon-Marbles-1234649187/. ↑

 

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous The Terry House: Case Study about Donor Conditions
Next The Real Banksy: Anonymity and Authenticity in the Art Market

Related Art Law Articles

Fragment from (1912) EGON SCHIELE (1890-1918) Ich liebe Gegensätze
Art lawrestitution

US Museums Return Schiele artworks to the heirs of Fritz Grünbaum

January 31, 2024
Center for Art Law
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

A recent report by the World Jewish Restitution Or A recent report by the World Jewish Restitution Organization (WRJO) states that most American museums provide inadequate provenance information for potentially Nazi-looted objects held in their collections. This is an ongoing problem, as emphasized by the closure of the Nazi-Era Provenance Internet Portal last year. Established in 2003, the portal was intended to act as a public registry of potentially looted art held in museum collections across the United States. However, over its 21-year lifespan, the portal's practitioners struggled to secure ongoing funding and it ultimately became outdated. 

The WJRO report highlights this failure, noting that museums themselves have done little to make provenance information easily accessible. This lack of transparency is a serious blow to the efforts of Holocaust survivors and their descendants to secure the repatriation of seized artworks. WJRO President Gideon Taylor urged American museums to make more tangible efforts to cooperate with Holocaust survivors and their families in their pursuit of justice.

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more.

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #museumissues #nazilootedart #wwii #artlawyer #legalresearch
Join us for the Second Edition of Center for Art L Join us for the Second Edition of Center for Art Law Summer School! An immersive five-day educational program designed for individuals interested in the dynamic and ever-evolving field of art law. 

Taking place in the vibrant art hub of New York City, the program will provide participants with a foundational understanding of art law, opportunities to explore key issues in the field, and access to a network of professionals and peers with shared interests. Participants will also have the opportunity to see how things work from a hands-on and practical perspective by visiting galleries, artist studios, auction houses and law firms, and speak with professionals dedicated to and passionate about the field. 

Applications are open now through March 1st!

🎟️ APPLY NOW using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlawsummerschool #newyork #artlaw #artlawyer #legal #lawyer #art
Join us for an informative presentation and pro bo Join us for an informative presentation and pro bono consultations to better understand the current art and copyright law landscape. Copyright law is a body of federal law that grants authors exclusive rights over their original works — from paintings and photographs to sculptures, as well as other fixed and tangible creative forms. Once protection attaches, copyright owners have exclusive economic rights that allow them to control how their work is reproduced, modified and distributed, among other uses.

Albeit theoretically simple, in practice copyright law is complex and nuanced: what works acquire such protection? How can creatives better protect their assets or, if they wish, exploit them for their monetary benefit? 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #copyright #CLE #trainingprogram
In October, the Hispanic Society Museum and Librar In October, the Hispanic Society Museum and Library deaccessioned forty five paintings from its collection through an auction at Christie's. The sale included primarily Old-Master paintings of religious and aristocratic subjects. Notable works in the sale included a painting from the workshop of El Greco, a copy of a work by Titian, as well as a portrait of Isabella of Portugal, and Clemente Del Camino y Parladé’s “El Columpio (The Swing). 

The purpose of the sale was to raise funds to further diversify the museum's collection. In a statement, the institution stated that the works selected for sale are not in line with their core mission as they seek to expand and diversify their collection.

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more.

#centerforartlaw #artlawnews #artlawresearch #legalresearch #artlawyer #art #lawyer
Check out our new episode where Paris and Andrea s Check out our new episode where Paris and Andrea speak with Ali Nour, who recounts his journey from Khartoum to Cairo amid the ongoing civil war, and describes how he became involved with the Emergency Response Committee - a group of Sudanese heritage officials working to safeguard Sudan’s cultural heritage. 

🎙️ Click the link in our bio to listen anywhere you get your podcasts! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legal #research #podcast #february #legalresearch #newepisode #culturalheritage #sudaneseheritage
When you see ‘February’ what comes to mind? Birthd When you see ‘February’ what comes to mind? Birthdays of friends? Olympic games? Anniversary of war? Democracy dying in darkness? Days getting longer? We could have chosen a better image for the February cover but somehow the 1913 work of Umberto Boccioni (an artist who died during World War 1) “Dynamism of a Soccer Player” seemed to hit the right note. Let’s keep going, individuals and team players.

Center for Art Law is pressing on with events and research. We have over 200 applications to review for the Summer Internship Program, meetings, obligations. Reach out if you have questions or suggestions. We cannot wait to introduce to you our Spring Interns and we encourage you to share and keep channels of communication open. 

📚 Read more using the link in our bio! Make sure to subscribe so you don't miss any upcoming newsletters!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legal #research #newsletter #february #legalresearch
Join the Center for Art Law for conversation with Join the Center for Art Law for conversation with Frank Born and Caryn Keppler on legacy and estate planning!

When planning for the preservation of their professional legacies and the future custodianship of their oeuvres’, artists are faced with unique concerns and challenges. Frank Born, artist and art dealer, and Caryn Keppler, tax and estate attorney, will share their perspectives on legacy and estate planning. Discussion will focus on which documents to gather, and which professionals to get in touch with throughout the process of legacy planning.

This event is affiliated with the Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic which seeks to connect artists, estate administrators, attorneys, tax advisors, and other experts to create meaningful and lasting solutions for expanding the art canon and art legacy planning. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #clinic #artlawyer #estateplanning #artistlegacy #legal #research #lawclinic
Authentication is an inherently uncertain practice Authentication is an inherently uncertain practice, one that the art market must depend upon. Although, auction houses don't have to guarantee  authenticity, they have legal duties related to contract law, tort law, and industry customs. The impact of the Old Master cases, sparked change in the industry including Sotheby's acquisition of Orion Analytical. 

📚 To read more about the liabilities of auction houses and the change in forensic tools, read Vivianne Diaz's published article using the link in our bio!
Join us for an informative guest lecture and pro b Join us for an informative guest lecture and pro bono consultations on legacy and estate planning for visual artists.

Calling all visual artists: join the Center for Art Law's Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic for an evening of low-cost consultations with attorneys, tax experts, and other arts professionals with experience in estate and legacy planning.

After a short lecture on a legacy and estate planning topic, attendees with consultation tickets artist will be paired with one of the Center's volunteer professionals (attorneys, appraisers and financial advisors) for a confidential 20-minute consultation. Limited slots are available for the consultation sessions.

Please be sure to read the entire event description using the LinkedIn event below.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
On May 24, 2024 the UK enacted the Digital Markets On May 24, 2024 the UK enacted the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (DMCC). This law increases transparency requirements and consumer rights, including reforming subscription contracts. It grants consumers cancellation periods during cooling-off times. 

Charitable organizations, including museums and other cultural institutions, have concerns regarding consumer abuse of this option. 

🔗 Read more about this new law and it's implications in Lauren Stein's published article, including a discussion on how other jurisdictions have approached the issue, using the link in our bio!
Don't miss our on our upcoming Bootcamp on Februar Don't miss our on our upcoming Bootcamp on February 4th! Check out the full event description below:

Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
The expansion of the use of collaborations between The expansion of the use of collaborations between artists and major consumer corporations brings along a myriad of IP legal considerations. What was once seen in advertisement initiatives  has developed into the creation of "art objects," something that lives within a consumer object while retaining some portion of an artists work. 

🔗 Read more about this interesting interplay in Natalie Kawam Yang's published article, including a discussion on how the LOEWE x Ghibli Museum fits into this context, using the link in our bio.
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law