• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • 2025 Year-End Appeal
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • 2025 Year-End Appeal
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Where will the Parthenon Marbles Go?
Back

Where will the Parthenon Marbles Go?

November 28, 2023

image from the British museum of Elgin Marbles Parthenon

By Dea Sula

There has been a global trend of restitution and repatriation of cultural objects. Hundreds of items have been repatriated in 2023.[1] Countries are passing laws to make the process more efficient, such as France, which has passed three laws in 2023 to increase the efficiency of restitution.[2] Similarly, other countries are encouraging the return of their cultural objects, such as Poland, which has initiated 130 restitution claims,[3] and Nigeria in its pursuit of the Benin Bronzes.[4] Museum institutions are also taking part. The Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York launched a new initiative to go through its entire collection to identify any stolen objects.[5]

In contrast, one institution that has been generally resistant to restitution is the British Museum. The Parthenon Marbles, which have been in the museum’s possession since 1816, is a case study of many of the legal issues and constraints that museums face regarding restitution, as well as the international issues that arise from cultural objects that were removed from their place of origin prior to the modern period.[6]

Acquisition

The Parthenon is a temple that was built in ancient Athens, Greece during the 5th century BCE.[7] Over time, the Parthenon changed purpose, becoming a church and a mosque, eventually being used to house weaponry and gunpowder in 1687.[8] By the 1800s the Parthenon was considered a ruin, and half of the sculptures were lost. [9]

During the period of the Parthenon Marbles’ acquisition, Greece was a province in the Ottoman Empire.[10] Thomas Bruce, also known as the Earl of Elgin, was assigned as the British Ambassador to the Ottoman state, and during his tenure, he acquired a set of statutes and friezes from the Parthenon through authorization from the Ottoman government.[11] Elgin was attracted to the historical and artistic merit of the sculptures, a nod to the neoclassical resurgence that was popular in England. Elgin claimed that local people were using the statues as targets for shooting practice, so his acquisition was in an attempt to preserve the sculptures, as well.

The pieces were sent to England, surviving a shipwreck in 1804, and arrived in 1806.[12] Even then, the Marbles were contentious, as there were both supporters and critics of the move. The poet Lord Byron famously wrote The Curse of Minerva in part due to his distaste for what Elgin had done.[13] The House of Commons launched an investigation into the legality of transporting the Marbles, and Elgin published a defense of his actions in 1810.[14] The crown purchased the collection of statues in 1816, which were placed in the British Museum.[15]

From this time, the Parthenon Marbles have continued to be a source of controversy and illustrate international museum legal issues surrounding cultural property.

Movement for Repatriation

The Greek government has been asking for the return of the Parthenon Marbles since its independence in 1835.[16] The first official request was made in 1983. Regarding the issue, the then Greek Minister of Culture Melina Mercouri, in a speech to Oxford University, said,

“You must understand what the Parthenon Marbles mean to us. They are our pride. They are our sacrifices. They are our noblest symbol of excellence. They are a tribute to the democratic philosophy. They are our aspirations and our name. They are the essence of Greekness.”[17]

The requests for repatriation have continued into the current day, often being a topic of discussion when politicians from Greece and England meet; the last talks regarding repatriation occurred in 2021 and 2022.[18][19]

In addition, international bodies and other countries have pressured the British Museum to return the Marbles. For example, UNESCO authorized a committee recommendation to return the Marbles,[20] a suggestion that was soundly rejected.[21] In a later post Brexit trade negotiation, the EU stated that Britain would need to return the Marbles in order to reach a trade deal.[22] Another example is the Chinese president Xi Jinping publicly supporting Greece in their quest for the return of the Marbles.[23]

Greece argues that the Marbles are part of the Greek people’s cultural heritage and should be returned. Now, there is a large modern museum complex dedicated to the Parthenon, and the Greek government argues that the collection of Marbles should be a complete set located in the museum. On the legal side, Greece argues that the permission to remove the Marbles came from an occupying force, not the Greek government, and therefore the consent was not legitimate.[24] The opposing argument is that the Ottoman government was legitimate at the time of the agreement and could therefore grant ownership of the Marbles to Elgin. The “illegal sale” argument is also weakened by the large amount of time between the time of sale and the current claims.[25]

To support keeping the Marbles in London, proponents argue that the Marbles are part of global heritage, where cultural heritage belongs to everyone as part of a universal human history.[26] A spokesperson for the museum argued, “we’re not going to dismantle our great collection as it tells a unique story of our common humanity.”[27] It would be a blow to the museum to lose the Marbles for artistic and historical reasons. Another argument is the long-term care of the Marbles, as the statues that have remained in Athens have been heavily affected by pollution and acid rain.[28] This argument is not as strong since the Marbles can now be housed in the Acropolis Museum.[29] This argument also looks weaker due to the British Museum’s own maintenance issues, such as a roof leak that caused the Marbles enough damage for them to not be displayed for a year.[30]

Legal Issues

A block to potentially returning the Marbles is the legal restraints on the British Museum from the British government. The 1963 Museum Act specifically regulates the British Museum Board on deaccessioning items.[31] The Board of Trustees cannot remove or return any object from the collection unless it is a duplicate, physically damaged, “unfit to be retained the collection,” or no longer of public interest.[32] This policy was approved by the board of trustees in 2018 and is set to be reviewed in 2023.[33]

While the law generally blocks removing items from the collection, the British government has passed laws bypassing the requirement; in 2004 for human remains,[34] and in 2009 for Nazi-looted work.[35] Even with current British law, the 2022 Charities Act might be a way for the museum to return the Marbles.[36] Under the law, trustees have the power to return objects “if there is a compelling moral obligation to do so,” giving trustees the ability to say yes to returning the Marbles if they find it a moral obligation.[37]

Therefore, while the 1965 Act is still in effect, it can be bypassed when there is enough political will to do so or if the trustees find the return of the Marbles a morally compelling issue. The question is if that drive or moral attitude exists and if it is strong enough to counter the political objections regarding the Marbles. An indication that this resolve does not exist is from the 2019 resignation letter of one of the board members, claiming that the museum regarding restitution was “born and bred in empire and colonial practice, [and] is coming under scrutiny. And yet it hardly speaks.”[38]

Ways forward?

One outcome is that the British Museum will not return the Marbles due to legal constraints or lack of desire to do so. Another outcome is if the British government and the board authorize a return of the Marbles through a specific law or through an amendment to the current law, although this is unlikely.

A loan agreement structure has been proposed, as the British Museum Chair of Trustees said the museum is “seeking new positive, long term partnerships with countries and communities around the world, and that of course includes Greece.”[39] The Greek government will likely reject this since it is seeking ownership and would not want the British government to retain an ownership interest.

Even if the British Museum were to return the Marbles, further issues for the British Museum would likely follow since many of the museum’s pieces came from similar circumstances. One restitution could create a snowball effect on the British Museum collection. But if the museum does not change its policies, public opinion may go against the museum, especially in a time where there is a global push for repatriation.

Overall, it appears that the Parthenon Marbles will continue to be contentious objects since no clear resolution is in sight. The British Museum’s stance on the Marbles reflects its position generally against restitution, an increasingly unpopular stance in the art world. The issues the Pantheon Marbles present will persist as repatriation and restitution remain forefront issues regarding cultural property.

 

Suggested Readings

Who Saved the Parthenon?: A New History of the Acropolis Before, During and After the Greek Revolution By William St. Clair

Return or Retain? The Parthenon Marbles Debate

The past, present: The Parthenon Sculptures dispute as an example of the ICPRCP’s role on claims barred by the non-retroactivity of the 1970 UNESCO Convention By Letícia Machado Haertel

After 220 Years, the Fate of the Parthenon Marbles Rests in Secret Talks By Alex Marshall

About the Author

Dea Sula is a current third year law student at Santa Clara University School of Law. She is passionate about Intellectual Property and Art Law. She is the current Center for Art Law Case Law Corner Database project coordinator.

Sources:

  1. Emily Buracke, Is 2023 the Year Looted Art Returns Home?, Town and Country (Sep. 20, 2023),https://www.townandcountrymag.com/leisure/arts-and-culture/a42660309/repatriated-artwork-timeline-2023/. ↑
  2. Francesca Aton, Three Laws Proposed by France’s Ministry of Culture May Lead to Groundbreaking Restitutions, ARTnews (Jan. 18, 2023), https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/france-proposed-laws-restitution-african-art-human-remains-1234654048/. ↑
  3. Emily Buracke, Is 2023 the Year Looted Art Returns Home?, Town and Country (Sep. 20, 2023),https://www.townandcountrymag.com/leisure/arts-and-culture/a42660309/repatriated-artwork-timeline-2023/. ↑
  4. Id. ↑
  5. Robin Pogrebin and Graham Bowley, After Seizures, the Met Sets a Plan to Scour Collections for Looted Art, N.Y. Times (May 9, 2023), https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/09/arts/met-museum-looted-art.html. ↑
  6. Historically called the Elgin Marbles. ↑
  7. The Parthenon, Ancient-Greece.org ( https://www.ancient-greece.org/architecture/parthenon.html ↑
  8. The Editors of Encyclopaedia, Elgin Marbles, Encyclopedia Britannica (Sep. 3, 2023), https://www.britannica.com/topic/Elgin-Marbles. ↑
  9. Id. ↑
  10. Id. ↑
  11. Id. ↑
  12. Id. ↑
  13. Edited by Peter Cochran, The Curse of Minerva, https://petercochran.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/the_curse_of_minerva1.pdf ↑
  14. The Editors of Encyclopaedia, Elgin Marbles, Encyclopedia Britannica (Sep. 3, 2023), https://www.britannica.com/topic/Elgin-Marbles. ↑
  15. Id. ↑
  16. Salvatore Settis, History in the making, The Guardian (Jan. 19, 2004), https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2004/jan/19/art.parthenon. ↑
  17. Alison Lindsey Moore, Looted Art: The Case of the Parthenon Sculptures, 34 THE OSPREY JOURNAL OF IDEAS AND INQUIRY (2007), https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1033&context=ojii_volumes. ↑
  18. Tessa Solomon, The British Museum Has Been in Secret Talks with Greece Over the Return of the Parthenon Marbles, ARTnews (Dec. 5, 2022), https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/british-museum-and-greece-secretly-discuss-return-of-parthenon-Marbles-1234649187/. ↑
  19. Geraldine Kendall Adams, British Museum opens door to Parthenon deal with Greece, Museums Association (Aug. 2, 2022), https://www.museumsassociation.org/museums-journal/news/2022/08/british-museum-opens-door-to-parthenon-deal-with-greece/. ↑
  20. Tessa Solomon, UNESCO Advisory Board Urges British Museum to Return the Parthenon Marbles, ARTnews (Oct. 4, 2021), https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/unesco-advisory-board-urges-british-museum-to-return-the-parthenon-Marbles-1234605592/. ↑
  21. News Desk, UK GOVERNMENT REJECTS UNESCO PLEA TO READDRESS OWNERSHIP OF PARTHENON MARBLES, Art Forum (Oct. 7, 2021), (https://www.artforum.com/news/uk-government-rejects-unesco-plea-to-readdress-ownership-of-parthenon-Marbles-250760/ ↑
  22. Adam Payne, The EU Will Tell Britain to Give Back the Ancient Parthenon Marbles, Taken from Greece Over 200 Years Ago, If It Wants a Post-Brexit Trade Deal, BUS. INSIDER (Feb. 20, 2020), https://www.businessinsider.com/brexit-eu-to-ask-uk-to-return-elgin-Marbles-to-greece-in-trade-talks2020-2. ↑
  23. Illiani Magra, In Struggle Over Parthenon Marbles, Greece Gets Unexpected Ally: Xi Jinping, N.Y. TIMES (Nov. 13, 2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/13/world/europe/parthenonMarbles-xi-jinping-greece-china.html. ↑
  24. Alison Lindsey Moore, Looted Art: The Case of the Parthenon Sculptures, 34 THE OSPREY JOURNAL OF IDEAS AND INQUIRY (2007), https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1033&context=ojii_volumes. ↑
  25. Id. ↑
  26. Tessa Solomon, The British Museum Has Been in Secret Talks with Greece Over the Return of the Parthenon Marbles, ARTnews (Dec. 5, 2022), https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/british-museum-and-greece-secretly-discuss-return-of-parthenon-Marbles-1234649187/. ↑
  27. Id. ↑
  28. John E. Yocom, Air Pollution Damage To Buildings On The Acropolis, 29 Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association 333 (1979), https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00022470.1979.10470796. ↑
  29. The Acropolis Museum https://www.theacropolismuseum.gr/en. ↑
  30. Cristina Ruiz, How British Museum’s maintenance woes have kept Parthenon Marbles off view for a full year, The Art Newspaper (Nov. 2, 2021), https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2021/11/02/how-maintenance-woes-kept-parthenon-Marbles-off-view ↑
  31. Alexandra Tremayne-Pengelly, The UK Has a 60-Year Old Law Prohibiting Repatriation of Art. Is That About to Change?, The Observer (Feb. 11, 2023), https://observer.com/2023/02/the-uk-has-a-60-year-old-law-prohibiting-repatriation-of-art-is-that-about-to-change/#:~:text=Under%20the%20act%2C%20the%20British,to%20the%20museum’s%20deaccessioning%20policy. ↑
  32. The British Museum Board of Trustees, De-accession Policy, The British Museum (Sep. 29, 2018), https://www.britishmuseum.org/sites/default/files/2019-10/De-accession_Policy_Nov2018.pdf. ↑
  33. Id. ↑
  34. Human Tissue Act 2004 (c. 30), https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/30/contents. ↑
  35. Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) Act 2009 (c. 16), https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/16/section/1. ↑
  36. Charities Act 2022 (c. 6), https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2022/6/contents/enacted. ↑
  37. Duncan Howitt-Marshall, New Charities Act may compel museums to return cultural artifacts, Ekathimerini (Sep. 30, 2022), https://www.ekathimerini.com/culture/1194535/new-charities-act-may-compel-museums-to-return-cultural-artifacts/. ↑
  38. Ahdaf Soueif, On Resigning from the British Museum’s Board of Trustees, London Review of Books Blog (July 15, 2019), https://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2019/july/on-resigning-from-the-british-museum-s-board-of-trustees. ↑
  39. Tessa Solomon, The British Museum Has Been in Secret Talks with Greece Over the Return of the Parthenon Marbles, ARTnews (Dec. 5, 2022), https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/british-museum-and-greece-secretly-discuss-return-of-parthenon-Marbles-1234649187/. ↑

 

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous The Terry House: Case Study about Donor Conditions
Next The Real Banksy: Anonymity and Authenticity in the Art Market

Related Posts

Frida photographed by her father, Guillermo Kahlo, 1932. (Photo: Guillermo Kahlo via Wikimedia Commons, Public domain)

Owning Frida Kahlo: The Frida Kahlo Corporation and Trademark Law

June 20, 2024

Fractionalized Art Ownership and Securities Law

November 19, 2019

Digitizing Europe’s Cultural Heritage

January 11, 2011
Center for Art Law
Sofia Tomilenko Let there be light!

A Gift for Us

this Holiday Season

Thank you to Sofia Tomilenko (the artist from Kyiv, Ukraine who made this Lady Liberty for us) and ALL the artists who make our life more meaningful and vibrant this year! Let there be light in 2026!

 

Last Gift of 2025
Guidelines AI and Art Authentication

AI and Art Authentication

Explore the new Guidelines for AI and Art Authentication for the responsible, ethical, and transparent use of artificial intelligence.

Download here
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

What happens when culture becomes collateral damag What happens when culture becomes collateral damage in war?
In this episode of Art in Brief, we speak with Patty Gerstenblith, a leading expert on cultural heritage law, about the destruction of cultural sites in recent armed conflicts.

We examine the role of international courts, the limits of accountability, and whether the law can truly protect history in times of war.

We would like to also thank Rebecca Bennett for all of her help on this episode. 

 🎙️ Click the link in our bio to listen anywhere you get your podcasts.

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #artlawyer #lawyer #podcast #artpodcast #culturalheritage #armedconflict #internationallaw
Where did you go to recharge your batteries? Where did you go to recharge your batteries?
Let there be light! Center for Art Law is pleased Let there be light! Center for Art Law is pleased to share with you a work of art by Sofia Tomilenko, an illustration artist from Kyiv, Ukraine. This is Sofia's second creation for us and as her Lady Liberty plays tourist in NYC, we wish all of you peace and joy in 2026! 

Light will overcome the darkness. Світло переможе темряву. Das Licht wird die Dunkelheit überwinden. La luz vencerá la oscuridad. 

#artlaw #peace #artpiece #12to12
Writing during the last days and hours of the year Writing during the last days and hours of the year is de rigueur for nonprofits and what do we get?

Subject: Automatic reply: Thanks to Art Law! 

"I am now on leave until January 5th. 
. . .
I will respond as soon as I can upon on my return. For anything urgent you may contact ..."

Well, dear Readers, Students, Artists and Attorneys, we see you when you're working, we know when you're away, and we promise that in 2026 Art Law is coming to Town (again)!

Best wishes for 2026, from your Friends at the Center for Art Law!

#fairenough #snowdays #2026ahead #puttingfunback #fundraising #EYO2025
Less than a week left in December and together we Less than a week left in December and together we have raised nearly $32,000 towards our EOY fundraising $35,000 goal. If we are ever camera shy to speak about our accomplishments or our goals, our work and our annual report speak for themselves. 

Don’t let the humor and the glossy pictures fool you, to reach our full potential and new heights in 2026, we need your vote of confidence. No contribution is too small. What matters most is knowing you are thinking of the Center this holiday season. Thank you, as always, for your support and for being part of this community! 

#artlaw #EOYfundraiser #growingin2026 #AML #restitution #research #artistsright #contracts #copyright #bringfriends
This summer, art dealer James White and appraiser This summer, art dealer James White and appraiser Paul Bremner pleaded guilty for their participation in the third forgery ring of Norval Morisseau works uncovered by Canadian authorities. Their convictions are a key juncture in Canda's largest art fraud scheme, a scandal that has spanned decades and illuminated deep systemic failures within the art market to protect against fraud. 

Both White and Bremner were part of what is referred to as the 'Cowan Group,' spearheaded by art dealer Jeffrey Cowan. Their enterprise relied on Cowan fabricating provenance for the forged works, which he claimed were difficult to authenticate. 

In June, White, 87, pleaded guilty to to creating forged documents and possessing property obtained by crime for the purpose of trafficking. Later, in July, Paul Bremner pleaded guilty to producing and using forged documents and possessing property obtained through crime with the intent of trafficking. While Bremner, White, and Cowan were all supposed to face trial in the Fall, Cowan was the only one to do so and was ultimately found guilty on four counts of fraud. 

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more.

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #artfraud #artforgery #canada #artcrime #internationallaw
It's the season! It's the season!
In 2022, former art dealer Inigo Philbrick was sen In 2022, former art dealer Inigo Philbrick was sentenced to seven years in prison for committing what is considered one of the United States' most significant cases of art fraud. With access to Philbrick's personal correspondence, Orlando Whitfield chronicled his friendship with the disgraced dealer in a 2024 memoir, All that Glitters: A Story of Friendship, Fraud, and Fine Art. 

For more insights into the fascinating story of Inigo Philbrick, and those he defrauded, read our recent book review. 

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more!

#centerforartlaw #legalresearch #artlaw #artlawyer #lawer #inigophilbrick #bookreview #artfraud
The highly publicized Louvre heist has shocked the The highly publicized Louvre heist has shocked the globe due to its brazen nature. However, beyond its sheer audacity, the heist has exposed systemic security weaknesses throughout the international art world. Since the theft took place on October 19th, the French police have identified the perpetrators, describing them as local Paris residents with records of petty theft. 

In our new article, Sarah Boxer explores parallels between the techniques used by the Louvre heists’ perpetrators and past major art heists, identifying how the theft reveals widespread institutional vulnerability to art crime. 

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #artcrime #theft #louvre #france #arttheft #stolenart
In September 2025, 77-year old Pennsylvania reside In September 2025, 77-year old Pennsylvania resident Carter Reese made headlines not only for being Taylor Swift's former neighbor, but also for pleading guilty to selling forgeries of Picasso, Basquiat, Warhol, and others. This and other recent high profile forgery cases are evidence of the art market's ongoing vulnerability to fraudulent activity. Yet, new innovations in DNA and artificial intelligence (AI) may help defend against forgery. 

To learn more about how the art market's response to fraud and forgery is evolving, read our new article by Shaila Gray. 

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #artlawyer #lawyer #AI #forgery #artforgery #artfakes #authenticity
Did you know that Charles Dickens visited America Did you know that Charles Dickens visited America twice, in 1842 and in 1867? In between, he wrote his famous “A Tale of Two Cities,” foreshadowing upheavals and revolutions and suggesting that individual acts of compassion, love, and sacrifice can break cycles of injustice. With competing demands and obligations, finding time to read books in the second quarter of the 21st century might get increasingly harder. As we live in the best and worst of times again, try to enjoy the season of light and a good book (or a good newsletter).

From all of us at the Center for Art Law, we wish you peace, love, and understanding this holiday season. 

🔗 Read more by clicking the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #artlawyer #december #newsletter #lawyer
Is it, or isn’t it, Vermeer? Trouble spotting fake Is it, or isn’t it, Vermeer? Trouble spotting fakes? You are not alone. Donate to the Center for Art Law, we are the real deal. 

🔗 Click the link in our bio to donate today!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #endofyear #givingtuesday #donate #notacrime #framingartlaw
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law