• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • Institutional Subscription
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • Institutional Subscription
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Our articles image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Case Review image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Case Review: U.S. v. Righter (FL/CA, 2020)
Back

Case Review: U.S. v. Righter (FL/CA, 2020)

November 9, 2020

By Olivia Baker.

Forgeries have undeniable adverse effects on the art world. Some forgers have avoided being discovered and others have luckily been caught, Phillip Righter being a recent one. Righter was recently convicted in two criminal cases involving a series of art forgeries, the first one filed on June 20, 2019 in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida and the second filed on March 23, 2020 in the United States Central District of California.[1] Righter began selling fakes of Jean-Michel Basquiat, Keith Haring, and other well-known artists’ works sometime before 2016. He forged certificates of authenticity for artworks by artists whose estates stopped authenticating artworks in an attempt to make his fakes appear to be authentic. The Los Angeles police were investigating him as early as 2016, when they questioned him about a forged Keith Haring offered to a Miami gallery.[2] Although he traveled often to California, Righter resided primarily Florida where he was arrested on July 19, 2019 on fraud and identity theft charges where he was trying to sell counterfeit art, for more than $1 million to a gallery owner.[3] The California case was eventually transferred to the Southern District of Florida where his case with respect to his arrest had already begun.

Righter’s Modus Operandi

According to the U.S. Attorney, Erik M. Silber’s complaint filed in California, Phillip Righter started selling fake artworks to galleries and art collectors by telling prospective buyers he inherited some of the works from his grandmother and created elaborate backstories to make the forged artworks seem authentic.[4] He forged documents to show links between the artworks and his family, a Wisconsin art museum, and a prominent New York City gallery. Also according to the allegations against him, Righter told one prospective buyer that he had donated a number of his artworks to his Ivy League alma mater,[5] all of which was an effective lie. On August 1, 2016 Righter sent an email to the owner of a prominent art gallery in Aventura, FL, that falsely stated that he owned a collection of Keith Haring works in New York, beginning his string of many lies whereby he falsely claimed ownership of artworks by Haring and Jean-Michel Basquiat.[6] In his communications with different prospective buyers, lenders, and third-party brokers, he would give specific payment instructions to direct funds to him, following which he would sent a shipment of forged and fraudulent artworks, accompanied with fake certificates of authenticity.[7]

Unauthenticated Certificates of Authenticity

Righter quickly understood the value of certificates of authenticity in determining a work’s marketability and value, which can be demonstrated through the artwork’s certification from a qualified authority, such as the artist’s estate or foundation.[8] These letters, if credible, are even more valuable when an estate ceases to authenticate artworks. Both estates of Jean-Michel Basquiat and Keith Haring disbanded their authentication committees in 2012 due to complicated lawsuits,[9] which Righter used to his advantage.

The record shows that in 2016, after a brief encounter with the FBI, Righter stopped acting in his own name and started to forge letters of authenticity to make the art more believable to buyers. This led to two counts of identity theft in Florida:

  • The first count for the name and signature of Julia Gruen, the former Executive Director of the Keith Haring Foundation, on a fraudulent authentication letter dated August 2016.[10]
  • The second count applies to the similar usage of the name and signature of Gerard Basquiat, the artist’s father and the first Administrator of the Estate of Jean-Michel Basquiat.[11]

Fake artworks and authentication letters purporting to be issued by the Jean-Michel Basquiat Foundation. Exhibits submitted in the indictment in U.S. v. Righter, No. 1:20-cr-20164 (C.D. Cal. July 15, 2020).

To endow the fraudulent with convincing pedigree, Righter also ordered stamps that appeared as if they were authentic stamps of “The Authentication Committee of the Estate of Jean-Michel Basquiat” and “The Estate of Keith Haring, Seal of Authenticity.” Along with the stamps, Righter also created fraudulent gallery labels for the fake Basquiat artwork stating the piece was purchased from the Annina Nosei Gallery, a New York gallery specializing in Basquiat art. These fraudulent labels, stamps, and documents caused victims to believe that the artworks were legitimate.

Righter’s scheme also enabled him to use fake artworks as collateral to obtain loans.[12] Along with the Basquiat and Haring works, he was also able to successfully submit a fake Roy Litchenstein piece as a collateral for a $100,000 loan.[13] In total, Righter’s “fraudulent scheme caused an actual loss of at least $758,265 and had intended loss of at least $5,656,500.”[14]

Lastly, around February 26, 2016, Righter “willfully made and subscribed to a materially false Amended United States Income Tax Return, Form 1040X, for the tax year 2015, which was verified by written declaration that it was made under the penalty of perjury, which was filed with the Internal Revenue Service.”[15] Righter knew this was a lie. He claimed a false casualty and theft loss of $2,575,00 related to artwork that he had claimed to be stolen, which in reality was fraudulent and had no value. He was not entitled to claim that loss, yet he received over $100,000 in returns.

Righter’s Fall

The Los Angeles police had been investigating Righter as early as 2016 for these fraudulent activities. An FBI agent and a detective from the Los Angeles Police Department interviewed Righter about the fraudulent Keith Haring art that he attempted to sell to a Miami gallery and warned him about selling fraudulent art. Nonetheless, his fraudulent art activities continued. Eventually his schemes caught up to him, and on July 19, 2019, he was arrested in South Florida on fraud and identity theft charges. The first case was filed on June 20, 2019 in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida. As his schemes in both Florida and California came to light after his arrest, a second case was filed on March 23, 2020 in the United States Central District of California. Since he was arrested in Florida and the cases involved the same illegal actions, the California case was transferred over to the District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

In the California case, Righter “admitted using fake paintings as collateral for loans on which he later defaulted and using fraudulent pieces for fraudulent write-offs on his income tax returns.” He agreed to plead guilty to the [all] three felony offenses in the case originally begun in California.[16] In Florida, on March 12, 2020, Philip Righter pleaded guilty to one count of mail fraud and one count of aggravated identity theft. He was also found guilty of wire fraud, aggravated identity theft, tax fraud, and mail fraud. Whereas he could have faced up to 25 years in prison, U.S. District Judge Marcia G. Cooke chose to sentence him to 60 months’ imprisonment in both cases, which he will be able to serve simultaneously since the illegal actions and the incidents were very close together in time.

Takeaways

Experts say the problem of fraudulent art has grown because of the increase of online art sales. There have also been new inventions of more sophisticated methods to forging artworks that have led to an increase in forgeries.[17] Erik Silber, a prosecutor from the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles, said the scope of the plea agreement in Righter’s case will send an abundantly clear message to people looking to engage in this kind of fraudulent activity. He also stated in a phone interview with Courthouse News that “hopefully this will send a message from the FBI’s Art Crime Team and the United States Attorney’s Office that these types of cases will be fully prosecuted.”[18]

This case also shows the importance of having certificates of authenticity for artworks by artists whose estates no longer authenticate artworks. Art buyers and sellers should be aware of what estates do not authenticate works anymore and when exactly they disbanded. This will make it easier to tell when something like an authentication letter has been forged which will hint that the artwork is also forged. The works in both these cases have been seized by the FBI[19] and are no longer in circulation, but there may be more of Righter’s fakes in the market––art buyer beware!


Endnotes:

  1. U.S. v. Righter, No. 1:19-cr-20370 (S.D. Fla. July 15, 2020) and U.S. v. Righter, No. 1:20-cr-20164 (C.D. Cal. July 15, 2020). ↑
  2. Sarah Cascone, A Los Angeles Man Who Forged Documents to ‘Authenticate’ Fake Works by Warhol and Basquiat Has Pleaded Guilty to Federal Fraud Charges, Artnet News (Mar. 11, 2020). ↑
  3. Release, U.S. Att’y Office for S.D. Fla., A California Resident Charged in Scheme to Sell Forged Artworks in South Florida (Aug. 7, 2019). See also, Daniel Victor and Christine Hauser, California Man Pleads Guilty in $6 Million Art Fraud Case, New York Times (Mar. 13, 2020). ↑
  4. Id. ↑
  5. U.S. Attn’y Office for S.D. Fla., supra. ↑
  6. FL: Indictment, 6, U.S. v. Righter, No. 1:19-cr-20370 (S.D. Fla. July 15, 2020). ↑
  7. FL: Indictment, 5, U.S. v. Righter, No. 1:19-cr-20370 (S.D. Fla. July 15, 2020). ↑
  8. FL: Indictment, 2, U.S. v. Righter, No. 1:19-cr-20370 (S.D. Fla. July 15, 2020). ↑
  9. Irina Tarsis, Authentication Committees Disband: Warhol 2011, Basquiat 2012, Who’s Next?, Center for Art Law (Jan. 25, 2012); The Keith Haring Foundation Announces Its Decision To Disband Authentication Committee, Center for Art Law (Sept. 20, 2012). ↑
  10. FL: Indictment, 8, U.S. v. Righter, No. 1:19-cr-20370 (S.D. Fla. July 15, 2020). ↑
  11. Id. ↑
  12. Id. ↑
  13. CA: Plea Agreement,13, U.S. v. Righter, No. 1:20-cr-20164 (C.D. Cal. July 15, 2020). ↑
  14. CA: Plea Agreement,16, U.S. v. Righter, No. 1:20-cr-20164 (C.D. Cal. July 15, 2020). ↑
  15. CA: Indictment, 5, U.S. v. Righter, No. 1:20-cr-20164 (C.D. Cal. July 15, 2020). ↑
  16. Daniel Victor and Christine Hauser, supra. ↑
  17. Id. ↑
  18. Carson McCullough, California Man Pleads Guilty to Modern Art Fraud Scheme, Courthouse News (Mar. 10, 2020). ↑
  19. Margaret Carrigan, California man sentenced to five years in prison for $6m international art fraud scheme, The Art Newspaper (July 16, 2020). ↑

About the Author: Olivia Baker was a Summer 2020 Intern at the Center for Art Law and a senior at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, Virginia. She is studying Studio art history with minors in Art History and Business. Olivia can be reached at oliviab3@vt.edu.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for general information only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. Opinions expressed are those of the author.

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Case Review: René Gimpel’s Heirs Fight for Restitution by French Museums (2020)
Next Case Review: Meaders v. Helwaser (2020)

Related Art Law Articles

Screen shot from Google scholar of different Warhol cases
Art lawCase ReviewArt Law

Degrees of Transformation: Andy Warhol’s 102 minutes of fame before the Supreme Court

November 17, 2022
Art lawArt Law

“Outsider Artists” and Inheritance Law: What Happens to an Artist’s Work When They Die Without a Will?

November 11, 2022
Art lawCase ReviewArt LawCase Review

Case Review: US v. Philbrick (2022)

November 7, 2022
Center for Art Law
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

The Gelman Collection, one of the most significant The Gelman Collection, one of the most significant collections of modern Mexican art, is at the center of an ongoing legal and financial controversy. With works by Frida Kahlo, Diego Rivera, María Izquierdo, and others, the collection raises complex questions about the protections afforded to National Artistic Monuments under Mexican law. 

Paula Gutierrez de Villasante examines what the collection's uncertain future could mean for Mexico’s cultural heritage. 

📚Read the full article at the link in our bio!

#ArtLaw #CulturalHeritage #MexicanArt #FridaKahlo #ArtFinance
Learn about Artist Corporations-- exploring what t Learn about Artist Corporations-- exploring what they are, how they work, and the legal and practical considerations for artists!

Please note, this is a hybrid event. Participants are welcome to attend either in person or online via Zoom..

Join the Center for Art Law for Artist Corporations: A New Legal Framework for Creative Practice, a conversation exploring the Colorado Artist Companies Act and what it could mean for artists, lawyers, policymakers, and the broader creative economy.

In 2025, Colorado enacted Senate Bill 133, creating the Artist Corporation (A-Corp); a first-of-its-kind legal business structure designed specifically to recognize and support artists and creative professionals. The legislation offers a new model for balancing artistic practice with sustainable business and legal protections, raising important questions about how the law can better serve creative communities.

Join us for a discussion featuring Lindsay Korotkin, Yancey Strickler, and Sarah Darlene, who will examine the origins of the Artist Corporation, the legislative process behind its creation, and its practical implications for working artists. Drawing on their respective backgrounds in law, advocacy, entrepreneurship, and artistic practice, the panelists will discuss how this innovative legal framework came to fruition, how artists may benefit from it, and whether similar legislation could shape the future of creative industries beyond Colorado.

Following the panel discussion, attendees will have the opportunity to participate in a live audience Q&A as well as a Networking Reception. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #colorado #artistissues
For more than two decades, thousands of counterfei For more than two decades, thousands of counterfeit works attributed to Canadian Anishinaabe artist Norval Morrisseau circulated through galleries, auctions, and private collections. The resulting forgery scandal has made authenticating Morrisseau’s work increasingly difficult and raised larger questions about protecting artists' legacies and the integrity of the art market. 

In her article, Victoria Cook examines the history of the Morrisseau forgery ring and how emerging technologies could help distinguish genuine works from fakes. 

📚 Read the full article at the link in our bio!

1st 📷: Norval Morrisseau, Observations of the Astral World (c. 1994), acrylic on canvas, 236 x 514 cm, National Gallery of Canada, Ottawa

#ArtLaw #ArtForgery #NorvalMorrisseau #IndigenousArt #CanadianArt
Don't miss grabbing tickets for our upcoming Collo Don't miss grabbing tickets for our upcoming Colloquium with Dr Michail Risvas, Lecturer in Law and Co-Director of the Centre for International Law and Globalisation at the University of Southampton, on the growing role of arbitration in the art and cultural heritage sector. 

Drawing on his research and practical examples, Professor Risvas will examine how arbitration is being used to resolve a broad range of art-related and cultural heritage disputes. The program will compare arbitration with traditional litigation, exploring the advantages and limitations of each forum.

Through discussion of case examples and emerging trends, participants will gain a practical understanding of when arbitration may offer a more effective path than litigation and how alternative dispute resolution is shaping the future of art and cultural heritage law.

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #artlawyer #lawyer #arbitration #artmarket #artist #culturalheritage
Join the Center for Art Law along with Dr Michail Join the Center for Art Law along with Dr Michail Risvas, Lecturer in Law and Co-Director of the Centre for International Law and Globalisation at the University of Southampton, on the growing role of arbitration in the art and cultural heritage sector. Drawing on his research and practical examples, Professor Risvas will examine how arbitration is being used to resolve a broad range of art-related and cultural heritage disputes. The program will compare arbitration with traditional litigation, exploring the advantages and limitations of each forum.

Through discussion of case examples and emerging trends, participants will gain a practical understanding of when arbitration may offer a more effective path than litigation and how alternative dispute resolution is shaping the future of art and cultural heritage law.

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #artlawyer #lawyer #arbitration #artmarket #artist #culturalheritage
And just like that, we’ve reached the end of an in And just like that, we’ve reached the end of an inaugural ART & LAW INTENSIVE ✨

Five-day program filled with challenging questions, fascinating discussions, new perspectives, and meaningful encounters at the intersection of visual art and law.

Grateful for the conversations, the knowledge shared, and everyone who made this experience so enriching. 

Until the next chapter in February!
Our last (August) newsletter received excellent vi Our last (August) newsletter received excellent viewing (in September). Welcome back from vacations! You may be pleased to know that our ART x LAW INTENSIVE in Zurich went as promised and we were delighted to have shared with and learned from so many wonderful experts, colleagues, and fellow travelers. Special guests came from North and South America, across Europe, even India and UAE. Without skipping a beat, today we onboard our Fall 2026 Interns, students from Cardozo, NYU, Smith College and other schools, and we are pleased to welcome our 2026-2027 Judith Bresler Fellow, Alexander Stanfield.

Please take a look at our SEPTEMBER newsletter and plan to join us this fall for in person or online events. Thank you to all who have reached out and offered to volunteer over the summer and recently. We are humbled by the growing interest and will keep offering learning and hands-on opportunities as the size of our organization permits. Stay calm and … 

📚 Click the link in our bio to get a curated collection of art law news, our most recent published articles, upcoming events, and much more!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #newsletter #september #legalresearch
What does it take to report and write a story abou What does it take to report and write a story about stolen art, war, and the people caught at the center of it?

In our latest episode of Art in Brief, Andrea and Paris are joined by Matthew Campbell, award-winning reporter for Bloomberg Businessweek and author of The Man Who Stole the Gods, to discuss his years-long investigation into the looting and trafficking of ancient Khmer artifacts from Cambodia.

We talk about Matthew’s research and reporting process, why he chose to center the story around the book’s main characters, and how he approached telling the stories of complicated figures with nuance and empathy.

🎙️ Listen to the latest episode of Art in Brief and find additional resources including a link to Matthew's book at the link in our bio!

#podcast #centerforartlaw #artinbrief #bloomberg #artcrime
What happens to an artist’s work, archives, and in What happens to an artist’s work, archives, and intellectual property after they’re gone? 

Day 2 of the 2026 CPAL Conference brought together lawyers, appraisers, foundation leaders, and arts professionals to tackle the practical realities of preserving artists’ legacies. Topics included estate planning and appraisals, copyright, archives, and the financial realities of running an artist foundation. One message was especially clear: legacy preservation starts long before an artist’s death. 

📚Read Ian Silverstein’s recap of the conference at the link in our bio!

#WYWH #ArtLaw #ArtistEstates #ArtLawConference #ArtAndLaw
Don't miss out on our upcoming Workshop on fiducia Don't miss out on our upcoming Workshop on fiduciary duties within artist-dealer relationships with speaker Aaron Haines!

This workshop will explore the fiduciary duties of gallerists toward their clients and will clarify the distinctions between contract-based relationships and the broader fiduciary obligations gallerists owe, including transparency, prudence, and the prohibition of undisclosed profits. It will also examine common conflicts of interest in the art world and how these fiduciary duties come into play. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #workshop #artistrights #artist #artdealer
The Wilbur J. Cohen Federal Building in Washington The Wilbur J. Cohen Federal Building in Washington, D.C. houses five murals and four reliefs by artists including Ben Shahn and Philip Guston. 
The building is now among federal properties currently slated for sale as the government accelerates selling federal real estate. 

What happens to artworks that are physically inseparable from the buildings they were created for? And what does their uncertain future mean for America’s cultural landscape?

📚 Read Sam Brady-Myerov’s latest article at the link in our bio!

#ArtLaw #CenterforArtLaw #NewDealArt #PublicArt #CulturalHeritage
Did you know the portrait of George Washington on Did you know the portrait of George Washington on the $1 bill traces back to a painting by Gilbert Stuart? 

As the US celebrates its 250th anniversary, one of our latest articles explores how Stuart fought to control the reproduction of his Washington portraits at a time when U.S. copyright law did not yet protect paintings. 

📚 Read the full article by Hannah Gadway at the link in our bio! 

#ArtLaw #America250 #GilbertStuart #GeorgeWashington #CopyrightLaw
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law

Become a Member

Since 2009, the Center for Art Law has organized hundreds of events and published over 1,200 relevant, accessible, and editorially independent articles. As a nonprofit working with artists and students, the Center for Art Law relies on your support to fund our work. Become a premium subscriber and gain access to discounts on events and archives of articles and/or hundreds of case summaries, intended for a worldwide audience of legal professionals, artists, researchers, and students.

Camille Pissarro Rue St Honore apres midi effet de pluie 1897 compressed compressed compressed compressed
$70 /per year

Case Law Corner

See All Benefits

Read case law summaries and enjoy unlimited access to our legendary Case Law Corner, now in a new and improved Database with over 700 entries.

Get this subscription
$75 /per year

Artist & Student Membership

See All Benefits
  • Access to all articles and past-event recordings
  • Access to our Case Law Database
  • Free and discounted access to events
Get this subscription
$150 /per year

Annual Subscription

See All Benefits
  • Access to all articles and past-event recordings
  • Access to Case Law Database
  • Free and discounted access to events
  • Discounts to third-party events
Get this subscription
Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.