• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Case Review image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Case Review: U.S. v. Righter (FL/CA, 2020)
Back

Case Review: U.S. v. Righter (FL/CA, 2020)

November 9, 2020

By Olivia Baker.

Forgeries have undeniable adverse effects on the art world. Some forgers have avoided being discovered and others have luckily been caught, Phillip Righter being a recent one. Righter was recently convicted in two criminal cases involving a series of art forgeries, the first one filed on June 20, 2019 in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida and the second filed on March 23, 2020 in the United States Central District of California.[1] Righter began selling fakes of Jean-Michel Basquiat, Keith Haring, and other well-known artists’ works sometime before 2016. He forged certificates of authenticity for artworks by artists whose estates stopped authenticating artworks in an attempt to make his fakes appear to be authentic. The Los Angeles police were investigating him as early as 2016, when they questioned him about a forged Keith Haring offered to a Miami gallery.[2] Although he traveled often to California, Righter resided primarily Florida where he was arrested on July 19, 2019 on fraud and identity theft charges where he was trying to sell counterfeit art, for more than $1 million to a gallery owner.[3] The California case was eventually transferred to the Southern District of Florida where his case with respect to his arrest had already begun.

Righter’s Modus Operandi

According to the U.S. Attorney, Erik M. Silber’s complaint filed in California, Phillip Righter started selling fake artworks to galleries and art collectors by telling prospective buyers he inherited some of the works from his grandmother and created elaborate backstories to make the forged artworks seem authentic.[4] He forged documents to show links between the artworks and his family, a Wisconsin art museum, and a prominent New York City gallery. Also according to the allegations against him, Righter told one prospective buyer that he had donated a number of his artworks to his Ivy League alma mater,[5] all of which was an effective lie. On August 1, 2016 Righter sent an email to the owner of a prominent art gallery in Aventura, FL, that falsely stated that he owned a collection of Keith Haring works in New York, beginning his string of many lies whereby he falsely claimed ownership of artworks by Haring and Jean-Michel Basquiat.[6] In his communications with different prospective buyers, lenders, and third-party brokers, he would give specific payment instructions to direct funds to him, following which he would sent a shipment of forged and fraudulent artworks, accompanied with fake certificates of authenticity.[7]

Unauthenticated Certificates of Authenticity

Righter quickly understood the value of certificates of authenticity in determining a work’s marketability and value, which can be demonstrated through the artwork’s certification from a qualified authority, such as the artist’s estate or foundation.[8] These letters, if credible, are even more valuable when an estate ceases to authenticate artworks. Both estates of Jean-Michel Basquiat and Keith Haring disbanded their authentication committees in 2012 due to complicated lawsuits,[9] which Righter used to his advantage.

The record shows that in 2016, after a brief encounter with the FBI, Righter stopped acting in his own name and started to forge letters of authenticity to make the art more believable to buyers. This led to two counts of identity theft in Florida:

  • The first count for the name and signature of Julia Gruen, the former Executive Director of the Keith Haring Foundation, on a fraudulent authentication letter dated August 2016.[10]
  • The second count applies to the similar usage of the name and signature of Gerard Basquiat, the artist’s father and the first Administrator of the Estate of Jean-Michel Basquiat.[11]

Fake artworks and authentication letters purporting to be issued by the Jean-Michel Basquiat Foundation. Exhibits submitted in the indictment in U.S. v. Righter, No. 1:20-cr-20164 (C.D. Cal. July 15, 2020).

To endow the fraudulent with convincing pedigree, Righter also ordered stamps that appeared as if they were authentic stamps of “The Authentication Committee of the Estate of Jean-Michel Basquiat” and “The Estate of Keith Haring, Seal of Authenticity.” Along with the stamps, Righter also created fraudulent gallery labels for the fake Basquiat artwork stating the piece was purchased from the Annina Nosei Gallery, a New York gallery specializing in Basquiat art. These fraudulent labels, stamps, and documents caused victims to believe that the artworks were legitimate.

Righter’s scheme also enabled him to use fake artworks as collateral to obtain loans.[12] Along with the Basquiat and Haring works, he was also able to successfully submit a fake Roy Litchenstein piece as a collateral for a $100,000 loan.[13] In total, Righter’s “fraudulent scheme caused an actual loss of at least $758,265 and had intended loss of at least $5,656,500.”[14]

Lastly, around February 26, 2016, Righter “willfully made and subscribed to a materially false Amended United States Income Tax Return, Form 1040X, for the tax year 2015, which was verified by written declaration that it was made under the penalty of perjury, which was filed with the Internal Revenue Service.”[15] Righter knew this was a lie. He claimed a false casualty and theft loss of $2,575,00 related to artwork that he had claimed to be stolen, which in reality was fraudulent and had no value. He was not entitled to claim that loss, yet he received over $100,000 in returns.

Righter’s Fall

The Los Angeles police had been investigating Righter as early as 2016 for these fraudulent activities. An FBI agent and a detective from the Los Angeles Police Department interviewed Righter about the fraudulent Keith Haring art that he attempted to sell to a Miami gallery and warned him about selling fraudulent art. Nonetheless, his fraudulent art activities continued. Eventually his schemes caught up to him, and on July 19, 2019, he was arrested in South Florida on fraud and identity theft charges. The first case was filed on June 20, 2019 in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida. As his schemes in both Florida and California came to light after his arrest, a second case was filed on March 23, 2020 in the United States Central District of California. Since he was arrested in Florida and the cases involved the same illegal actions, the California case was transferred over to the District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

In the California case, Righter “admitted using fake paintings as collateral for loans on which he later defaulted and using fraudulent pieces for fraudulent write-offs on his income tax returns.” He agreed to plead guilty to the [all] three felony offenses in the case originally begun in California.[16] In Florida, on March 12, 2020, Philip Righter pleaded guilty to one count of mail fraud and one count of aggravated identity theft. He was also found guilty of wire fraud, aggravated identity theft, tax fraud, and mail fraud. Whereas he could have faced up to 25 years in prison, U.S. District Judge Marcia G. Cooke chose to sentence him to 60 months’ imprisonment in both cases, which he will be able to serve simultaneously since the illegal actions and the incidents were very close together in time.

Takeaways

Experts say the problem of fraudulent art has grown because of the increase of online art sales. There have also been new inventions of more sophisticated methods to forging artworks that have led to an increase in forgeries.[17] Erik Silber, a prosecutor from the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles, said the scope of the plea agreement in Righter’s case will send an abundantly clear message to people looking to engage in this kind of fraudulent activity. He also stated in a phone interview with Courthouse News that “hopefully this will send a message from the FBI’s Art Crime Team and the United States Attorney’s Office that these types of cases will be fully prosecuted.”[18]

This case also shows the importance of having certificates of authenticity for artworks by artists whose estates no longer authenticate artworks. Art buyers and sellers should be aware of what estates do not authenticate works anymore and when exactly they disbanded. This will make it easier to tell when something like an authentication letter has been forged which will hint that the artwork is also forged. The works in both these cases have been seized by the FBI[19] and are no longer in circulation, but there may be more of Righter’s fakes in the market––art buyer beware!


Endnotes:

  1. U.S. v. Righter, No. 1:19-cr-20370 (S.D. Fla. July 15, 2020) and U.S. v. Righter, No. 1:20-cr-20164 (C.D. Cal. July 15, 2020). ↑
  2. Sarah Cascone, A Los Angeles Man Who Forged Documents to ‘Authenticate’ Fake Works by Warhol and Basquiat Has Pleaded Guilty to Federal Fraud Charges, Artnet News (Mar. 11, 2020). ↑
  3. Release, U.S. Att’y Office for S.D. Fla., A California Resident Charged in Scheme to Sell Forged Artworks in South Florida (Aug. 7, 2019). See also, Daniel Victor and Christine Hauser, California Man Pleads Guilty in $6 Million Art Fraud Case, New York Times (Mar. 13, 2020). ↑
  4. Id. ↑
  5. U.S. Attn’y Office for S.D. Fla., supra. ↑
  6. FL: Indictment, 6, U.S. v. Righter, No. 1:19-cr-20370 (S.D. Fla. July 15, 2020). ↑
  7. FL: Indictment, 5, U.S. v. Righter, No. 1:19-cr-20370 (S.D. Fla. July 15, 2020). ↑
  8. FL: Indictment, 2, U.S. v. Righter, No. 1:19-cr-20370 (S.D. Fla. July 15, 2020). ↑
  9. Irina Tarsis, Authentication Committees Disband: Warhol 2011, Basquiat 2012, Who’s Next?, Center for Art Law (Jan. 25, 2012); The Keith Haring Foundation Announces Its Decision To Disband Authentication Committee, Center for Art Law (Sept. 20, 2012). ↑
  10. FL: Indictment, 8, U.S. v. Righter, No. 1:19-cr-20370 (S.D. Fla. July 15, 2020). ↑
  11. Id. ↑
  12. Id. ↑
  13. CA: Plea Agreement,13, U.S. v. Righter, No. 1:20-cr-20164 (C.D. Cal. July 15, 2020). ↑
  14. CA: Plea Agreement,16, U.S. v. Righter, No. 1:20-cr-20164 (C.D. Cal. July 15, 2020). ↑
  15. CA: Indictment, 5, U.S. v. Righter, No. 1:20-cr-20164 (C.D. Cal. July 15, 2020). ↑
  16. Daniel Victor and Christine Hauser, supra. ↑
  17. Id. ↑
  18. Carson McCullough, California Man Pleads Guilty to Modern Art Fraud Scheme, Courthouse News (Mar. 10, 2020). ↑
  19. Margaret Carrigan, California man sentenced to five years in prison for $6m international art fraud scheme, The Art Newspaper (July 16, 2020). ↑

About the Author: Olivia Baker was a Summer 2020 Intern at the Center for Art Law and a senior at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, Virginia. She is studying Studio art history with minors in Art History and Business. Olivia can be reached at oliviab3@vt.edu.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for general information only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. Opinions expressed are those of the author.

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Case Review: Meaders v. Helwaser (2020)
Next Case Review: René Gimpel’s Heirs Fight for Restitution by French Museums (2020)

Related Art Law Articles

Screen shot from Google scholar of different Warhol cases
Art lawCase ReviewArt Law

Degrees of Transformation: Andy Warhol’s 102 minutes of fame before the Supreme Court

November 17, 2022
Art lawArt Law

“Outsider Artists” and Inheritance Law: What Happens to an Artist’s Work When They Die Without a Will?

November 11, 2022
Art lawCase ReviewArt LawCase Review

Case Review: US v. Philbrick (2022)

November 7, 2022
Center for Art Law
What the Heck is Copyright (2)

What is Copy, Right?

2026 Annual Conference

Let’s explore Visual Art, AI, and the Law in the 21st Century together.

 

Reserve Your Ticket TODAY
Guidelines AI and Art Authentication

AI and Art Authentication

Explore the Guidelines for AI and Art Authentication for the responsible, ethical, and transparent use of artificial intelligence.

Download here
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

Center for Art Law is very pleased to welcome Prof Center for Art Law is very pleased to welcome Professor Ben Zhao as the Keynote Speaker for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026! 

Ben Zhao is the Neubauer Professor of Computer Science at the University of Chicago where he, and a team of researchers at the university, developed NightShade & Glaze, two data-poisoning tools which protects artists' work from being scraped for AI data training. 

Professor Zhao will discuss tools, such as NightShade, which can assist in defending art in the age of AI. 

The 2026 conference will focus on copyright law as it relates to visual art, artificial intelligence, and the rapidly evolving legal landscape of the 21st century. The program will begin with Professor Zhao's keynote address, followed by three substantive panels designed to build on one another throughout the afternoon. In addition, we will host a curated group of exhibitors featuring databases, legal tools, and technology platforms relevant to artists’ rights, copyright, and AI. The program will conclude with a reception, providing time for continued discussion, networking, and engagement among speakers, exhibitors, and attendees. 

We hope you join us! Reserve your tickets now using the link in our bio 🎟️ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #copyrightlaw
A huge thank you to our hosts and incredible speak A huge thank you to our hosts and incredible speakers who made this London panel discussion truly special! 🙏✨ 🇬🇧 🇺🇦 

We were so fortunate to hear from:

🎤 Rakhi Talwar | RTalwar Compliance
🎤 Raminta Dereskeviciute | McDermott Will & Schulte
🎤 Daryna Pidhorna, Lawyer & Analyst | The Raphael Lemkin Society
🎤 Timothy Kompancheko | Bernard, Inc.
🎤 Yuliia Hnat | Museum of Contemporary Art NGO
🎤 Irina Tarsis | Center for Art Law

Your insights, expertise, and passion made this a conversation we won't forget. Thank you for sharing your time and knowledge with us! 💫

Bottom Line: the art market has power and responsibility. Our panel "Art, Money, and the Law: Sanctions & AML Enforcement in 2026" tackled the hard questions around money laundering, sanctions compliance, and what's at stake for art market participants in today's regulatory landscape.

⚠️ Regulators are watching and "history has it's eyes on you..." too We don't have to navigate the legal waters alone. Let's keep the conversation going.

What was your biggest takeaway? 

#ArtLaw #AMLCompliance #Sanctions #ArtMarket #ArtAndMoney #Enforcement2026
At the Center for Art Law we are preparing for our At the Center for Art Law we are preparing for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026, "What is Copy, Right? Visual Art, AI, and the Law in the 21st Century", and we hope you are as excited as we are! The event will take place on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School. 

In addition to the panels throughout the day, which will offer insights into the rapidly shifting landscape of art and copyright law, our conference will feature exhibitors showcasing resources for promoting artists' rights, and a silent auction aimed at bolstering the Center's efforts. 

We would like to invite you to take part in and support this year's Annual Art Law Conference by being an exhibitor or sponsor. We express our sincere appreciation to all of our sponsors, exhibitors and you! 

Find more information and reserve your tickets using the link in our bio! See you soon!
In this episode, we speak with art market expert D In this episode, we speak with art market expert Doug Woodham to unpack how Jean-Michel Basquiat became one of the most enduring cultural icons of our time.

Moving beyond his rise in 1980s New York, this episode focuses on what happened after his death. We explore how his estate, led by his father, shaped his legacy through control of supply, copyright, and narrative; how early collectors and market forces drove the value of his work; and how museums and media cemented his place in art history.

Together, we explore the bigger question: is creating great art enough, or does becoming an icon require an entire ecosystem working behind the scenes?

🎙️ Check out the podcast anywhere you get your podcasts using the link in our bio!

Also, please join us on May 27  for the highly anticipated Art Law Conference 2026, held at Brooklyn Law School and Online (Hybrid). Entitled “What is Copy, Right? Visual Art, AI, and the Law in the 21st Century,” this year’s conference explores the evolving relationship between visual art, copyright law, and artificial intelligence!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #podcast #legal #research #legalresearch #newepisode #artmarket #basquiat
Amy Sherald cancelled her mid-career retrospective Amy Sherald cancelled her mid-career retrospective, scheduled at the National Portrait Gallery (NPG) in D.C., after a curatorial controversy over the potential removal of her recent work, "Trans Forming Liberty" (2024). Sherald denounced the attempt to remove this work as a blatant and intentional erasure of trans lives. 

This is one of the best examples and the most illustrative examples of the current administration's growing efforts to control the Smithsonian Institution's programming. In this climate of political tension, how do cultural institutions defend themselves against censorship and keep their curatorial independence?

📚 Click the link in our bio to read more!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #artlawyer #legalreserach #artcuration #curatorialindependance #censorship
Grab 15% off tickets the upcoming bootcamp on Arti Grab 15% off tickets the upcoming bootcamp on Artist-Dealer Relations, now available online!! 

Center for Art Law’s Art Lawyering Bootcamp: Artist-Dealer Relationships is an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with visual artists and dealers, in the unique aspects of their relationship. The bootcamp will be led by veteran attorneys specializing in art law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to the main contracts and regulations governing dealers' and artists' businesses. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in the specificities of the law as applied to the visual arts.

Bootcamp participants will be provided with training materials, including presentation slides and an Art Lawyering Bootcamp handbook with additional reading resources.

Art Lawyering Bootcamp participants with CLE tickets will receive New York CLE credits upon successful completion of the training modules. CLE credits pending board approval.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!

Get 15% off using the code: Final15 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #artistdealer #CLE #trainingprogram
On the night of April 15–16, 2026 alone, Russia se On the night of April 15–16, 2026 alone, Russia sent hundreds of drones and missiles on sleeping cities across Ukraine, killing and injuring dozens of civilians. War is funded in part by individuals who have important artworks in their personal collections. This full-scale invasion of Ukraine, now in its fifth year, daily exacts a grave toll on Ukrainian lives and cultural heritage, while fundamentally disrupting European commerce. In response, art market participants have adapted their practices, most have accepted, if not always embraced, the need to scrutinize the source of funds and the ultimate beneficiaries of their transactions. Yet there is a growing sense that parts of the trade are holding their breath, waiting to see when they might safely return to dealing with the oligarchs who continue to fund the Russian war machine.

For art market participants operating in the UK, compliance is no longer a peripheral concern, it is a legal imperative. Regulators are watching, the consequences of non-compliance increasingly extend beyond administrative penalties into criminal liability, and private-public partnerships offer the most credible path toward a more resilient and trustworthy market. 

Join us on April 24th for a panel discussion in London on the current state of AML enforcement and sanctions.

🎟️ Grab your tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #artcrime #london #artissues #museumissues
Sotheby's sold Modigliani’s Portrait de Leopold Zb Sotheby's sold Modigliani’s Portrait de Leopold Zborowski to Cahn in 2003 for the low price of about $1.55 million. In 2016, Cahn claimed he was verbally informed about authenticity issues with the painting by Sotheby's. The parties did make an agreement regarding Cahn reselling with Sotheby's for a guaranteed price in exchange for releasing the auction house from all claims related to the painting. Cahn claims that he attempted to set this process in motion in June 2025, but he received no response. Cahn now seeks damages totaling $2.67 million, plus interest and attorneys’ fees, for breach of contract. 

Through this dispute, Vivianne Diaz's article highlights a bigger issue in the art market by explaining how forgeries negatively affect both collectors and auction houses, and how auction houses need to be more careful, but most importantly, proactive in their authentication determinations.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read more!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #art #Modigliani #LeopoldZborowski #sothebys
Don't miss our upcoming April 20th bootcamp on Art Don't miss our upcoming April 20th bootcamp on Artist-Dealer Relations, now available online!!

Center for Art Law’s Art Lawyering Bootcamp: Artist-Dealer Relationships is an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with visual artists and dealers, in the unique aspects of their relationship. The bootcamp will be led by veteran attorneys specializing in art law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to the main contracts and regulations governing dealers' and artists' businesses. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in the specificities of the law as applied to the visual arts.

Bootcamp participants will be provided with training materials, including presentation slides and an Art Lawyering Bootcamp handbook with additional reading resources.

Art Lawyering Bootcamp participants with CLE tickets will receive New York CLE credits upon successful completion of the training modules. CLE credits pending board approval.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #artistdealer #CLE #trainingprogram
The historic Bayeux Tapestry, conserved in Normand The historic Bayeux Tapestry, conserved in Normandy, France, is scheduled to be loaned from the Bayeux Museum to the British Museum for ten months beginning in the fall of 2026. This is the first time the tapestry will have returned to the UK in over 900 years. 

This loan, authorized by France, has raised multiple controversies, particularly over conservation concerns. Nevertheless, it has been made possible through a combination of factors, including improved conservation techniques, enhanced transport precautions, comprehensive loan agreements, insurance, and the application of relevant protective laws. 

Check out our recent article by Josie Goettel to read more about this historic loan regarding not only in its symbolic significance, but also in its technical complexity.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read more!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #legalresearch #legal #museumissues #bayeuxtapisserie #bayeuxtapestry #britishmuseum #bayeuxmuseum
Due to decreasing government funding and increasin Due to decreasing government funding and increasing operational costs, philanthropic giving is more essential than ever. Since the current administration took office, one-third of museums nationwide have lost government grants and contracts. These losses have set off a domino effect of difficult decisions, including laying off staff, cancelling public programming, and delaying maintenance and repairs. 

Many art museums are also still recovering from financial losses incurred during the Covid-19 Pandemic. This recent article by Kamée Payton explores how noncash charitable donation alternatives are used by cultural institutions as financing, and how noncash charitable donations can prove mutually beneficial for both donors and recipients—particularly in terms of tax treatment.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read more! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #legalresearch #museumissues #taxes #donations #taxtreatment
Brief newsletter instead of a list of abbreviation Brief newsletter instead of a list of abbreviations and dates (here is looking at you, AML and KYC, London, NY, Rome). A laconic message that as days are getting longer and we are charmed by sunshine, blooms, and prospects of holidays, the man-made world does not fail to disappoint (don’t believe me? put aside art law and read world news), and all that during the springtime.

On a high note, we are grateful to our Spring Interns who are finishing up their stint with the Center in a couple of weeks, well done! Together we invite you to the upcoming events in person and online. Come FY2027 (a.k.a. June), we will introduce you to the Summer Class and new Advisors. Hang in there through April and May, take notes, don’t forget – we are living in the best of times and the worst of times. Again. 

🔗 Check out our April newsletter, using the link in our bio, to get a curated collection of art law news, our most recent published articles, upcoming events, and much more!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #artissues #newsletter #april #legalresearch
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.