• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Case Review image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Case Review: Sotheby’s v. Greece
Back

Case Review: Sotheby’s v. Greece

September 24, 2018

By Jennie Nadel. 

Case citation: Barnet v. Greek Ministry of Culture, No. 1:18-cv-04963 (S.D.N.Y. June 5, 2018).

  • The Plaintiffs: Howard Barnet, Peter Barnet, and Jane Barnet, the trustees of the 2012 Saretta Barnet Revocable Trust and Sotheby’s Inc.
  • The Defendant: The Ministry of Culture and Sports of the Hellenic Republic.

The Beginning

Howard and Saretta Barnet were avid art collectors. They collected artworks and antiques for over 40 years. In their collection was an 8th century B.C.E. bronze statue of a Greek Geometric period horse. Howard Barnet passed away in 1993, leaving the Bronze Horse in the hands of his wife, Saretta. In March 2017 Saretta passed away, following the transfer of ownership of the Bronze Horse to the 2012 Saretta Barnett Revocable Trust for her three children: Howard, Peter, and Jane, the trustees.

The 14-cm (5 ½ inch) Bronze Horse was put up for an auction scheduled for May 14, 2018, hosted by Sotheby’s. The auction was titled “The Shape of Beauty: Sculpture from the Collection of Howard and Saretta Barnet”. Sotheby’s began public marketing for the sale on February 6, 2018, and posted videos and photographs of the upcoming auction around mid-April 2018. The full auction catalogue was posted online on April 25, 2018. 

Screen Shot 2018-09-21 at 11.12.25

The 5 ½ inch Bronze Greek Horse in the Geometric Style

Halt Before the Auction

However, one business day before the Bronze Horse went up for auction, estimated to sell for around $150,000-250,000, Dr. Elena Korka, the head of  the General Directorate of Antiquities and Cultural Heritage of the Hellenic Republic Ministry of Culture and Sports, also known as Greece, sent an urgent message regarding the sale. The message sent to Sotheby’s stated that there are no records to indicate that the figurine left the country in a legal way. Greece demanded that the Bronze Horse be immediately withdrawn from the list of items to be auctioned and that Sotheby’s cooperate in the repatriation of the item back to the Greek state. The letter also referred to the involvement of Robin Symes, from whom the Barnets bought the Bronze Horse in 1973. At the time, Symes was a respected antiquities dealer in London but decades later faced accusations of trading looted antiquities. 

Following Greece’s letter, Sotheby’s removed the Bronze Horse from sale as the accusations could potentially harm the sale of the piece, even though they claimed Greece had no legal right to the object. Subsequently, Howard, Peter, Jane, and Sotheby’s Inc. decided to take legal action against Greece, suing for interference without lawful justification and seeking declaratory relief to declare the respective rights of the parties regarding the Bronze Horse.

This is not the first time an object bought and owned by the Barnets has come under scrutiny for illicit trafficking. In 1999, Howard Barnet donated a black-figure Kylix (c.550-525 BCE) to the Metropolitan Museum of Art. This object was repatriated to the Italian Ministry of Culture in a transfer with the Met on February 21, 2006. 

The Barnet Family and Sotheby’s, Inc. argued that many of these bronze horses in a similar style were fashioned throughout mainland Greece and Crete. Around 1,100 similar objects are currently known to be in existence, including an example at the Louvre in Paris. It was acquired in 1912 and is believed to have come from Laconia, Greece. Sotheby’s argues that hundreds of these figures are privately owned or housed in museum collections outside of Greece. The plaintiffs argue that Howard and Saretta Barnet bought the Bronze Horse for €15,000 (roughly $20,000) in November 1973 in good faith. Prior to the Barnets, the provenance showed that the Bronze Horse was sold at a public auction in Switzerland by Münzen and Medaillen, a European auction house, on May 6, 1967. The Bronze Horse was also featured in a book titled Les chevaux de bronze dans l’art geometrique grec (Bronze horses in geometric Greek art) by Jean-Louis Zimmerman at the University of Geneva in 1989. 

Greece’s claim to the Bronze Horse impaired Sotheby’s ability to sell the figurine at auction.

Thus the Barnet family and Sotheby’s are seeking reimbursement from Greece for court costs, attorney’s fees, as well as whatever other reliefs are decided by the court. Sotheby’s lawsuit will mark the first time an auction house has sued a government. They ask that the judge “clarify the rights of legitimate owners.” So far no previous updates have been made since Sotheby’s asked Greece to come forward with facts of evidence on May 25, 2018.  

Read the complaint here.


Further readings:

  • Albertson, Lynda. “Auction Alert – Sotheby’s New York – a Bronze Greek Figure of a Horse.” ARCA. May 02, 2018. http://art-crime.blogspot.com/2018/05/auction-alert-sothebys-new-york-bronze.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed: arcablog (ARCAblog).
  • Brown, Stephen Rex. “Sotheby’s Sues Greece over Bronze Horse Set for Auction.” NY Daily News, June 5, 2018. http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/ny-metro-sothebys-greece-horse-auction-20180605-story.html. 
  • D’Arcy, David. “Sotheby’s Sues Greece over Its Claim to Ancient Bronze Horse.” The Art Newspaper, June 7, 2018. https://www.theartnewspaper.com/news/sotheby-s-sues-greece-over-its-claim-to-ancient-bronze-horse.
  • Kaplan, Isaac. “Sotheby’s Is Suing Greece, Its First Legal Action against a Country, over a Disputed Ancient Bronze Horse.” Artsy. June 6, 2018. https://www.artsy.net/news/artsy-editorial-sothebys-suing-greece-first-legal-action-country-disputed-ancient-bronze-horse.
  • The Metropolitan Museum of Art. “Statement by the Metropolitan Museum of Art on Its Agreement with Italian Ministry of Culture.” News release, February 21, 2006. The Met. https://web.archive.org/web/20170309031813/https:/www.metmuseum.org/press/news/2006/statement-by-the-metropolitan-museum-of-art-on-its-agreement-with-italian-ministry-of-culture.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for general information only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. Opinions expressed are those of the author.

About the Author: Jennie Nadel was a 2018 Summer  intern at the Center for Art Law. She graduated from Johns Hopkins University majoring in History of Art with a double minor in Museums & Society and Visual Arts. She is currently pursuing her M.A. in Art Business at Sotheby’s Institute. She can be reached at jennierebeccanadel@gmail.com.

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous May Flash: Basqui-what?
Next Case Review: Droit de suite… not so sweet

Related Posts

Will the Supreme Court Take Up Nazi-era Limitations Periods?

October 12, 2010
Images found in Complaint, Heritage Auctioneers & Galleries v. Christie’s, Sup Ct, New York County, 2014, Oing, J., index No. 651806/2014.

Parting Is Such Sweet Sorrow: Covenants Not to Compete Between Auction Houses

June 3, 2016
logo

Yes Rasta: Richard Prince loses copyright suit

March 24, 2011
Center for Art Law
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Collo Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Colloquium, discussing the effectiveness of no strike designations in Syria, on February 2nd. Check out the full event description below:

No strike designations for cultural heritage are one mechanism by which countries seek to uphold the requirements of the 1954 Hague Convention. As such, they are designed to be key instruments in protecting the listed sites from war crimes. Yet not all countries maintain such inventories of their own whether due to a lack of resources, political views about what should be represented, or the risk of misuse and abuse. This often places the onus on other governments to create lists about cultures other than their own during conflicts. Thus, there may be different lists compiled by different governments in a conflict, creating an unclear legal landscape for determining potential war crimes and raising significant questions about the effectiveness of no strikes as a protection mechanism. 

Michelle Fabiani will discuss current research seeking to empirically evaluate the effectiveness of no strike designations as a protection mechanism against war crimes in Syria. Using data on cultural heritage attacks from the height of the Syrian Conflict (2014-2017) compiled from open sources, a no strike list completed in approximately 2012, and measures of underlying risk, this research asks whether the designations served as a protective factor or a risk factor for a given site and the surrounding area. Results and implications for holding countries accountable for war crimes against cultural heritage are discussed. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #culturalheritage #lawyer #legalreserach #artlawyer
Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day train Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #copyright #CLE #trainingprogram
In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, The Phillips Collection sold seven works of art from their collection at auction in November. The decision to deaccession three works in particular have led to turmoil within the museum's governing body. The works at the center of the controversy include Georgia O'Keefe's "Large Dark Red Leaves on White" (1972) which sold for $8 million, Arthur Dove's "Rose and Locust Stump" (1943), and "Clowns et pony" an 1883 drawing by Georges Seurat. Together, the three works raised $13 million. Three board members have resigned, while members of the Phillips family have publicly expressed concerns over the auctions. 

Those opposing the sales point out that the works in question were collected by the museum's founders, Duncan and Marjorie Phillips. While museums often deaccession works that are considered reiterative or lesser in comparison to others by the same artist, the works by O'Keefe, Dove, and Seurat are considered highly valuable, original works among the artist's respective oeuvres. 

The museum's director, Jonathan P. Binstock, has defended the sales, arguing that the process was thorough and reflects the majority interests of the collection's stewards. He believes that acquiring contemporary works will help the museum to evolve. Ultimately, the controversy highlights the difficulties of maintaining institutional collections amid conflicting perspectives.

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more.
Make sure to check out our newest episode if you h Make sure to check out our newest episode if you haven’t yet!

Paris and Andrea get the change to speak with Patty Gerstenblith about how the role international courts, limits of accountability, and if law play to protect history in times of war.

🎙️ Click the link in our bio to listen anywhere you get your podcasts!
Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was a Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was arrested by Polish authorities in Warsaw. on December 4th. Butyagin is wanted by Ukraine for allegedly conducting illegal excavations of Myrmekion, an ancient city in Crimea. Located in present-day Crimea, Myrmekion was an Ancient Greek colony dating to the sixth century, BCE. 

According to Ukrainian officials, between 2014 and 2019 Butyagin destroyed parts of the Myrmekion archaeological site while serving as head of Ancient Archaeology of the Northern Black Sea region at St. Petersburg's Hermitage Museum. The resulting damages are estimated at $4.7 million. Notably, Russia's foreign ministry has denounced the arrest, describing Poland's cooperation with Ukraine's extradition order as "legal tyranny." Russia invaded and annexed Crimea in 2014.

🔗 Read more by clicking the link in our bio

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artcrime #artlooting #ukraine #crimea
Join us on February 18th to learn about the proven Join us on February 18th to learn about the provenance and restitution of the Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art.

A beloved Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art was accused of being looted by the Nazis. Professor Deborah Gerhardt will describe the issues at stake and the evidentiary trail that led to an unusual model for resolving the dispute.

Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #museumissues #artwork
“In the depth of winter, I finally learned that wi “In the depth of winter, I finally learned that within me there lay an invincible summer."
~ Albert Camus, "Return to Tipasa" (1952) 

Camus is on our reading list but for now, stay close to the ground to avoid the deorbit burn from the 2026 news and know that we all contain invincible summer. 

The Center for Art Law's January 2026 Newsletter is here—catch up on the latest in art law and start the year informed.
https://itsartlaw.org/newsletters/january-newsletter-which-way-is-up/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #lawyer #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #art #law #newsletter #january
Major corporations increasingly rely on original c Major corporations increasingly rely on original creative work to train AI models, often claiming a fair use defense. However, many have flagged this interpretation of copyright law as illegitimate and exploitative of artists. In July, the Senate Judiciary Committee on Crime and Counterterrorism addressed these issues in a hearing on copyright law and AI training. 

Read our recent article by Katelyn Wang to learn more about the connection between AI training, copyright protections, and national security. 

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more!
Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all- Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all-day  CLE program to train lawyers to work with visual artists and their unique copyright needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys specializing in copyright law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the li Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the life of Lauren Stein, a 2L at Wake Forest, as she crushes everything in her path. 

Want to help us foster more great minds? Donate to Center for Art Law.

🔗 Click the link below to donate today!

https://itsartlaw.org/donations/new-years-giving-tree/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #caselaw #lawyer #art #lawstudent #internships #artlawinternship
Paul Cassier (1871-1926 was an influential Jewish Paul Cassier (1871-1926 was an influential Jewish art dealer. He owned and ran an art gallery called Kunstsalon Paul Cassirer along with his cousin. He is known for his role in promoting the work of impressionists and modernists like van Gogh and Cézanne. 

Cassier was seen as a visionary and risk-tasker. He gave many now famous artists their first showings in Germany including van Gogh, Manet, and Gaugin. Cassier was specifically influential to van Gogh's work as this first showing launched van Gogh's European career.

🔗 Learn more about the impact of his career by checking out the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #law #lawyer #artlawyer #artgallery #vangogh
No strike designations for cultural heritage are o No strike designations for cultural heritage are one mechanism by which countries seek to uphold the requirements of the 1954 Hague Convention. As such, they are designed to be key instruments in protecting the listed sites from war crimes. Yet not all countries maintain such inventories of their own whether due to a lack of resources, political views about what should be represented, or the risk of misuse and abuse. This often places the onus on other governments to create lists about cultures other than their own during conflicts. Thus, there may be different lists compiled by different governments in a conflict, creating an unclear legal landscape for determining potential war crimes and raising significant questions about the effectiveness of no strikes as a protection mechanism. 

This presentation discusses current research seeking to empirically evaluate the effectiveness of no strike designations as a protection mechanism against war crimes in Syria. Using data on cultural heritage attacks from the height of the Syrian Conflict (2014-2017) compiled from open sources, a no strike list completed in approximately 2012, and measures of underlying risk, this research asks whether the designations served as a protective factor or a risk factor for a given site and the surrounding area. Results and implications for holding countries accountable for war crimes against cultural heritage are discussed. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #lawyer #culturalheritage #art #protection
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.