• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Our articles image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art Law History image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet IFAR: In lieu of an Obituary
Back

IFAR: In lieu of an Obituary

July 1, 2025

screenshot IFAR closure

By Irina Tarsis

On September 27, 2024, International Foundation for Art Research (IFAR) notified its mailing list of the plans to close. The email, entitled “Important News from IFAR,” stated that “After 55 years of championing the principles of authenticity and ethical ownership in the art world, the International Foundation for Art Research has made the difficult decision to begin winding down operations.” The message was unsigned. Like thunder in a clear sky, the announcement shocked the art law community, and sparked a flurry of emails and calls: “Impossible!” “Have you heard?!”

The full text of the September 2024 Press Release is available HERE. According to the announcement:

As we prepare to close this chapter, we are focused on ensuring a thoughtful and responsible transition and one that celebrates and preserves IFAR’s legacy. We are mapping out a timeline for when IFAR will conclude its programmatic work and cease operations, which we anticipate will take place in mid-2025. In the meantime, we are committed to serving as a resource to the art community, continuing our new online education programs, and completing research projects that have been submitted to us to date. However, we will no longer publish the IFAR Journal or host IFAR Evenings, as we focus on re-homing our mission-related assets, including the Art Law Database, Catalogues Raisonnés Database, and our Institutional Archive.

Source: Department of State, Division of Corporations, “Entity: International Foundation for Art Research, Inc.” (as of as of June 27, 2025), available at  https://apps.dos.ny.gov/publicInquiry/NameHistory

Established in 1969, IFAR became a venerable and standard-setting institution, with impeccable reputation, known for its high standard of excellence – across publications, events, and research. Under the decades of Sharon Flescher’s leadership, IFAR accumulated knowledge and talent, collected and created resources, and disseminated valuable and authoritative information. It set a high bar for other nonprofits operating in the United States and beyond, conducting research, shepherding together authoritative scholarship, and ushering experts from all relevant disciplines to provide opinions on ethics, authenticity, and legal standards.

An invitation to speak, write or opine for IFAR was tantamount to a certain and undisputed badge of honor in every professional’s cap. In 2017, this author together with Evelien Campfens contributed an article to the IFAR Journal about cultural heritage on loan from the Crimean Museums following the annexation of the peninsula. Drafting and editing Cri-Me-a-River! was a humbling experience, but also one of the publications this author is particularly proud of having drafted.

In addition to publishing the IFAR Journal, providing opinions on authenticity and provenance, IFAR also created and updated valuable research tools including, such as a bibliography of catalogues raisonne and an Art Law & Cultural Property Database (the Database). These resources were hailed by the luminaries of art law practice and scholarship, including the late Judith Bresler, co-author of Art Law: The Guide for Collectors, Investors, Dealers & Artists, and John Merryman, co-author of Law, Ethics and the Visual Arts. Bresler called IFAR’s Database “an invaluable resource for anyone involved in the art world,” and Merryman said that IFAR’s Art Law & Cultural Property Website was, “an unmatched digital resource for students, attorneys, art professionals, and others interested in American and international art and cultural property law.” See the undated IFAR’s promo about the Database.

Scholarly articles, sold out programs on authenticity and restitution, provenance research and law enforcement, influenced students of all ages and practitioners, collectors, and dealers. In March of 2022, IFAR was one of the first NGO organizations to comment about full scale evasion of Ukraine and the threat to its cultural heritage. Also that spring, IFAR held a webinar about the state of the Ukrainian cultural heritage threatened by the ongoing war unleashed by the Russian Federation and organized resources on the subject. IFAR could do a lot and IFAR cared.

Harrison Jacobs, “Longtime Art Authentication Nonprofit IFAR to Shut Down After 55 Years,” ARTnews (Sept. 27, 2024).

At the end of 2023, after 25 years of service, Dr. Sharon Flescher stepped down from the post, passing the baton to Dr. Lindsey Schneider, the fourth and final executive director of IFAR. From the outside, back in December 2023, there were no indicators that IFAR would go dark any time soon; on the contrary the expectation was more than half way to its centennial. The financials reported on the IFAR 990 Form indicate that the institution was not flush with cash, but it was comfortable. However, as reported in Art Forum on October 2, 2024, Schneider “performed a six-month assessment of the foundation’s activities and finances and concluded that the operation was no longer feasible.”

Art Authenticator IFAR to Cease Operations
News Desk, “Art Authenticator IFAR to Cease Operations” ARTFORUM (Oct. 2, 2024).

According to Jennifer Schipf, on IFAR Board starting September of 2023 and the ultimate chair of the organization stated “The board brought on a new executive director to help us chart the optimal future for IFAR, and, ultimately, her insights and analyses made it clear to us all that the best course of action is to wind down.” It is hard to believe that the optimal future for IFAR was shuttering, it was certainly not the optimal future for the IFAR followers and visitors. Perhaps we all could have done more.

Only five years earlier, according to one of Schipf’s predecessors, Jack Josephson (1930-2022), who chaired IFAR’s Board of Directors for 17 years after his retirement around 2016, said “[IFAR] is very much in business, they have some marvelous websites, catalogue raisonnes, lots of things where people can get solid background on objects they might be contemplating buying or selling, so it’s a great organization.” He was right, IFAR did have substantial influence in matters of stolen art, forgeries and more. IFAR did a lot.

Source: “Introduction to Provenance Research (May 2025), available at https://my.cheddarup.com/c/introduction-to-provenance-research-19412/items

Despite the announced closure, in May 2025, IFAR offered a series of workshops on provenance research, led by Lisa Duffy-Zeballos, Ph.D., Art Research Director, IFAR (for 17 years) and Theresa Kutasz-Christensen, Ph.D., Independent Art Research Consultant, who joined IFAR team in April of 2024. The Observer article featured this May program and made no reference to the imminent closure, and some optimists dared to hope that the promised closure would be delayed or cancelled altogether. Daniel Grant, who wrote for The Observer, quoted “Duffy-Zeballos as lamenting lack of “master’s degree programs focused on provenance research… in the United States.” He added “Looking to fill the gap, IFAR, a 55-year-old nonprofit that supports arts institutions with information on fakes, forgeries, frauds and authentication, launched a seven-class online course called, simply, Introduction to Provenance Research. The latest session, taught by Duffy-Zeballos with art historian Theresa Kutasz Christensen, kicked off yesterday (May 6).” Grant also quoted Schneider “It’s a kind of learning by doing… We designed our course to be skills-based rather than a theoretically based program focused on why provenance is important.” This ‘latest’ session apparently became IFAR’s last.

True to their word, IFAR must have wrapped operations by mid-2025 as planned, and as of 24 June, 2025 its site is stripped of all the substantive content but for a corporate farewell:

“After over 50 years of service to the art community, the International Foundation for Art Research has brought its work to a close. We are proud of our pioneering commitment to advancing scholarship and best practices for the ethical stewardship of art objects, and remain grateful for the longstanding support of our partners and patrons.”

Ethical stewardship and authenticity. Looking at the current IFAR page, there is much incredulity. How can this be real or right?! The September 2024 announcement promised “re-homing [IFAR] mission-related assets.” As of this writing, it is unclear how the ‘re-homing’ went and which parts of IFAR’s legacy ended up where.

What triggered the dismantling of an institution that had long served a beacon for members of its and our community? Lack of funding? Delayed succession? Lack of conviction? New form of intelligence? Yes, there are new authentication services offered, some with the assistance of AI. Still, in an age of fast news and proliferation of AI generated answers, the stolid substantial work of IFAR will be missed, and it is unclear whether other nonprofits serving legal and creative communities can fill the void.

Sample Dissolution Doc
VOLUNTARY DISSOLUTION OF NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS WITH ASSETS, Source: https://ag.ny.gov/sites/default/files/2023-02/dissolution-with-assets.pdf

What’s next? Governed by New York Not-For-Profit Corporation Law, if nothing else, voluntary dissolution of not-for profit corporations incorporated in New York with assets, such as IFAR, must be dissolved in accordance with the state law. According to the guidance helpfully provided by the Office of the New York State Attorney General Charities Bureau, the board must submit a plan for approval of the Attorney General and, if approved, within 270 days after the date on which the Attorney General or the Court approved the Plan, the corporation must carry out the Plan, pay its liabilities, distribute its assets and wind up its business in accordance with the Plan.

To date, it appears that no Certificate of Dissolution has been issued to IFAR. And while the site no longer offers access the IFAR archives and databases, the archives and files survive. In addition to the physical property, financial assets and liabilities, IFAR also retains intellectual property including trademarks in its name “IFAR” and “Stolen Art Alert.” Both, standard character marks, were renewed in 2021 for ten years. Who, if anybody will host the IFAR Evenings?

Knoedler & Company. Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20120218122000/http://knoedlergallery.com/

How have various aspects of IFAR been distributed and where? Perhaps to law schools, museums, or libraries? The mission of IFAR still deserves to be fulfilled as its assets must find new repositories to ensure the continued public benefit of the treasure trove that is/was IFAR. Perhaps the Attorney General will not accept the application for dissolution. Looking back, looking forward, the current state of IFAR’s site recalls the metamorphosis of the Knoedler Gallery website in 2011, that read:

Knoedler & Company closed for regular business
on November 30, 2011. Our staff remain available to assist you.
If you need further information, please call 212 794-0550.

Web.Archive.org

Knoedler, the oldest gallery in the US, was busy answering subpoenas and juggling irate collectors with forgeries on their hands.

IFAR and its affiliates played an active role in setting the Knoedler Saga straight. IFAR’s last chapter is not written yet. For now, and in all honesty, most of IFAR digital resources can still be accessed through the Wayback Machine.

About the Author:

Irina Tarsis, Esq., is the Founder and Managing Director of the Center for Art Law.

Select Sources:

  • International Foundation for Art Research, Ifar.org.
  • Harrison Jacobs, “Longtime Art Authentication Nonprofit IFAR to Shut Down After 55 Years,” ARTNews (Sept. 27, 2024), available at https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/art-authentication-nonprofit-ifar-to-shut-down-1234718928/
  • Campfens, Evelien and Irina Tarsis, “Cri-Me-a-River! Crimean Gold in the Crosshairs of Geopolitics,” IFAR, Vol. 18 (Summer 2017).
  • The News Desk, “Art Authenticator IFAR to Cease Operations,” Art Forum (Oct. 2, 2024), available at https://www.artforum.com/news/art-authenticator-ifar-to-cease-operation-560581/
  • Grant, Daniel, “Lost, Looted, Disputed: Why Provenance Is Still the Art World’s Blind Spot,” The Observer (May 7, 2025), available at https://observer.com/2025/05/ifar-how-to-learn-provenance-research-training-art-market/
  • The Ancient Egyptian Heritage and Archaeology Fund, Egyptologist Jack Josephson Discusses His Career, Chairman of IFAR Board (17 years), available https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFJoKQgAsFU
  • NYS Department of Taxation and Finance, “Voluntary dissolution of New York State not-for-profit corporations,” available https://www.tax.ny.gov/bus/doingbus/vol_dissolution.htm

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Oy May! Taking stock 70 years after World War II
Next The Institute of Art & Law Celebrates its 30th Anniversary

Related Art Law Articles

Center for Art Law IAL article
Art Law History

The Institute of Art & Law Celebrates its 30th Anniversary

September 26, 2025
CfAL Athens Article Parthenon Marbles
Art lawArt Law History

Room 18 should be Empty: Is a permanent loan enough to resolve the Parthenon Marbles dispute?

September 19, 2025
Center for Art Law Kunsthaus Zurich Buhrle collection Collectors room 2
Art lawArt Law HistoryMuseum issuesSee Art Think Art Law

Zurich Spotlight: Can the Art be Separated from … the Owner? How the Kunsthaus Museum is Addressing its Controversial Affiliations with National Socialism

August 18, 2025
Center for Art Law
August 2026 Summer Promo (2)

Get your leg up on art law

Just in time for 2026-2027

Become a member and access unlimited articles, our Case Law Database, event archives, and exclusive member pricing on all upcoming events.

Learn MORE
Immigration Guide for Artists 2026 Cover Page

Immigration Guide for Artists

Check out the 2026 overview of U.S. immigration pathways available to artists.

Learn MORE
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

Don't miss out on our upcoming Workshop on fiducia Don't miss out on our upcoming Workshop on fiduciary duties within artist-dealer relationships with speaker Aaron Haines!

This workshop will explore the fiduciary duties of gallerists toward their clients and will clarify the distinctions between contract-based relationships and the broader fiduciary obligations gallerists owe, including transparency, prudence, and the prohibition of undisclosed profits. It will also examine common conflicts of interest in the art world and how these fiduciary duties come into play. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #workshop #artistrights #artist #artdealer
The Wilbur J. Cohen Federal Building in Washington The Wilbur J. Cohen Federal Building in Washington, D.C. houses five murals and four reliefs by artists including Ben Shahn and Philip Guston. 
The building is now among federal properties currently slated for sale as the government accelerates selling federal real estate. 

What happens to artworks that are physically inseparable from the buildings they were created for? And what does their uncertain future mean for America’s cultural landscape?

📚 Read Sam Brady-Myerov’s latest article at the link in our bio!

#ArtLaw #CenterforArtLaw #NewDealArt #PublicArt #CulturalHeritage
Did you know the portrait of George Washington on Did you know the portrait of George Washington on the $1 bill traces back to a painting by Gilbert Stuart? 

As the US celebrates its 250th anniversary, one of our latest articles explores how Stuart fought to control the reproduction of his Washington portraits at a time when U.S. copyright law did not yet protect paintings. 

📚 Read the full article by Hannah Gadway at the link in our bio! 

#ArtLaw #America250 #GilbertStuart #GeorgeWashington #CopyrightLaw
The culture of dupes is continuing to plague artis The culture of dupes is continuing to plague artists. Those like Lauren Horn and Maggie Stephenson have been victims of others creating copycats of their work and selling it as their own.

Read KimberMarie's new article to understand the impact this issue has on artists and other communities along with ways to push back against the problem.

📚 Check out the full article using the link in our bio!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #artlawyer #dupes #counterfeits #artistrights #artists
Any interest in volunteering to help work with our Any interest in volunteering to help work with our Nazi-Era Looted Art Restitution Cases Project? Listen to Natasha describe her work and the cases she's had the chance to study.

📚 Click the link in our bio to learn more about the project and how to join!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #restitution #art #museums #artlawyer #legal #legalresearch
Who owns Hollywood’s past? 🎬📸 A thrifted box of 1 Who owns Hollywood’s past? 🎬📸

A thrifted box of 1930s photographs of actress Marion Davies opens up a much bigger question: who owns the image and the rights behind it? 

One of our latest articles explores the story behind these photographs, including MGM studio stamps, Davies’s handwritten dedication, and the distinction between owning a physical photograph and owning the intellectual property rights in its image.

📚To read the full story by Irina Tarsis, head to the link in our bio

https://itsartlaw.org/art-law/who-owns-hollywoods-past/ 

#ArtLaw #CopyrightLaw #MarionDavies #HollywoodHistory #CulturalHeritage
Join us on September 18th for an Art and Law Works Join us on September 18th for an Art and Law Workshop on fiduciary duties within artist-dealer relationships with speaker Aaron Haines.

This workshop will explore the fiduciary duties of gallerists toward their clients and will clarify the distinctions between contract-based relationships and the broader fiduciary obligations gallerists owe, including transparency, prudence, and the prohibition of undisclosed profits. It will also examine common conflicts of interest in the art world and how these fiduciary duties come into play. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #workshop #artistrights #artist #artdealer
For centuries, copying has been an integral part o For centuries, copying has been an integral part of Chinese artistic practice, blurring the line between homage and forgery. Many museums are at a loss for how to evaluate works that challenge Western notions of authenticity.

Through the ongoing debate over the MET’s Riverbank painting, our recent article examines how institutional interests and market value continue to shape perceptions of authenticity.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read the complete article by Lena Rohde!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #chineseart #zhangdaqian #changdaichien #artforgery #authenticity #museumlaw #arthistory #provenance #artmarket
The rapid rise of digital reconstruction has trans The rapid rise of digital reconstruction has transformed how cultural heritage is documented and preserved, particularly in regions affected by conflict. As 3D models and digital archives become more common, they also raise questions about ownership and cultural self-determination.

In her article, Jacqueline Koutrodimos-Lewis examines the preservation of Syria's cultural heritage. More specifically, how digital reconstructions can both protect endangered sites and act as a tool for erasure when local communities are excluded from the process.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read the complete article by Jacqueline Koutrodimos-Lewis!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #culturalheritage #digitalheritage #3Dreconstruction #provenance #archaeology #culturalproperty #digitization #palmyra #museumlaw
Recently our intern Hannah Gadway was able to go t Recently our intern Hannah Gadway was able to go to the Beaverbrook Art Gallery in New Brunswick. This gallery was included in a law suit between Lord Beaverbrook's Estate and a foundation he had established during his life. 

📚 See more about this case using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artresearch #estates #artist #foundation #gallery
Two sculptures have finally returned to Santiago d Two sculptures have finally returned to Santiago de Compostela after seventy-two years.

Our recent article examines the Spanish Supreme Court's decision to return the Abraham and Isaac sculptures to Santiago de Compostela, and the pivotal role that object identification played in resolving the dispute.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read the complete article by Lucas Güimil Valdés!

#centerforartlaw #artlawyer #artlaw #culturalheritage #restitution #provenanceresearch #spain #culturalproperty
Our recent article revisits Professor Matthias Wel Our recent article revisits Professor Matthias Weller's presentation introducing Germany's new Court of Arbitration for Nazi-Looted Cultural Property. It explores how the new tribunal differs from the former Limbach Commission and what its procedures, jurisdiction, and binding decisions could mean for future restitution claims.

📚 Read the full article by Savannah Weiler and Amanda Buonaiuto at the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlawyer #artlaw #culturalproperty #nazilootedart #restitution #provenanceresearch #culturalheritage #alternativedisputeresolution
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law
Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.